These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648562)
1. C v. S. Great Britain. Court of Appeal, Civil Division (23, 24, 25 Feb 1987) [and] Queen's Bench Division (17, 18, 20, 21, 23 Feb 1987) All Engl Law Rep; 1987 Feb 23-25 (date of decision); [1987] 1():1230-44. PubMed ID: 11648562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protecting the life of the unborn child. Grubb A; Pearl D Law Q Rev; 1987 Jul; 103():340-6. PubMed ID: 11658992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The abortion of a foetus incapable of being born alive. Aust Law J; 1987 Jul; 61(7):326-8. PubMed ID: 11655881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. C. v. S., 25 February 1987. United Kingdom. Court of Appeal Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():41. PubMed ID: 12346721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An action by putative father and unborn fetus to prevent termination. Brahams D Lancet; 1987 Mar; 1(8532):576-7. PubMed ID: 2881128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Doe v. Smith. Indiana. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Aug; 527():177-8. PubMed ID: 12041235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. U.S. and Anglo-Australian decisions on a husband's right to prevent abortion. Bentil JK Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(3):261-75. PubMed ID: 11659260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth. 31 Jan 1975. U.S. District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D Fed Suppl; 1975; 392():1362-79. PubMed ID: 11646047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Tremblay v. Daigle. Canada. Supreme Court Dom Law Rep; 1989 Aug; 62():634-65. PubMed ID: 12041082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Doe v. Smith. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1988 Jun; 108():2136-8. PubMed ID: 12041288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion: the father's rights. Gilbert RA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Doe v. Zimmerman. 3 Dec 1975. U.S. District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1975; 405():534-41. PubMed ID: 11646051 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Embryo transplant, parental conflict, and reproductive freedom: a prospective analysis of issues and arguments created by forthcoming technology. Coleman MN Hofstra Law Rev; 1987; 15(3):609-30. PubMed ID: 11659072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Coleman v. Coleman. Maryland. Court of Special Appeals Atl Report; 1984 Mar; 471():1115-21. PubMed ID: 11648494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tremblay v. Daigle. Canada. Quebec. Court of Appeal Dom Law Rep; 1989 Jul; 59():609-44. PubMed ID: 12041081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. People in Interest of S.P.B. Colorado. Supreme Court Pac Rep Second Ser; 1982 Oct; 651():1213-8. PubMed ID: 12041125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Woman has abortion, violating court's order on paternal rights. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1988 Apr; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11646659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Using the courts to stop abortion by injunction: Mock v. Brandanburg. Martin SL Can J Women Law; 1989-1990; 3(2):569-83. PubMed ID: 11659311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The husband's rights in abortion. Etzioni A Trial; 1976 Nov; 12(11):56-8. PubMed ID: 11664680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A man's right to be equal: the abortion issue. Shalev C Isr Law Rev; 1983; 18(3-4):381-430. PubMed ID: 11659119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]