These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648562)

  • 21. Paternal interests in the abortion decision: does the father have a say?
    Diggins M
    Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1989; 1989():377-97. PubMed ID: 11656041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The relationship between abortion and child destruction in English law.
    Mackay RD
    Med Law; 1988; 7(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 3231012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Jane L. v. Bangerter.
    U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1992 Dec; 809():865-80. PubMed ID: 11648409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Conn v. Conn.
    Indiana. Supreme Court
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Jul; 526():958-63. PubMed ID: 12041233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system.
    Kindregan CP
    Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Father fails in attempt to stop girlfriend's abortion.
    Dyer C
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 Mar; 294(6572):631-2. PubMed ID: 3103839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment.
    Hatch OG
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Conn v. Conn.
    Indiana. Court of Appeals, First District
    Wests North East Rep; 1988 Jul; 525():612-6. PubMed ID: 12041181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
    Berlin SI
    Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Abortion entitlement: absolute or qualified?
    Crawford JM
    Linacre Q; 1980 Feb; 47(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 11663078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Paternal obligations during pregnancy: breaking new ground.
    Merrick JC
    Politics Life Sci; 1994 Aug; 13(2):251-3. PubMed ID: 11654646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
    Henry KS
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Canada's Supreme Court rejects ex-lover's effort to halt abortion.
    Barron J
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Aug; ():A1, A3. PubMed ID: 11647413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Roe v. Wade: what rights the biological father?
    Georgius EH
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1974; 1(1):251-72. PubMed ID: 11664368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The inadequacies of Australian abortion law.
    Cica N
    Aust J Fam Law; 1991 Mar; 5(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11656112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Jones v. Smith.
    U.S. District Court, S.D. Florida
    Fed Suppl; 1979 Jul; 474():1160-72. PubMed ID: 11648523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reproduction and the law.
    Erickson NS
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 11649200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Planned Parenthood Association v. Fitzpatrick. 4 Sep 1975.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
    Fed Suppl; 1975; 401():554-94. PubMed ID: 11646052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements violate right to privacy in abortion decision.
    Sanders JE
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 24(2):446-62. PubMed ID: 11664628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.