249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648570)
1. United States v. Charters.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Fed Report; 1988 Dec; 863():302-15. PubMed ID: 11648570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. United States v. Charters.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Fed Report; 1987 Sep; 829():479-500. PubMed ID: 11648561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of a mentally ill individual's right to refuse medication under the United States and the New York State constitutions.
Brooks WM
Touro Law Rev; 1991; 8(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 11659527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rogers v. Okin.
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Fed Report; 1984 Jun; 738():1-9. PubMed ID: 11648487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. United States v. Bryant.
U.S. District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division
Fed Suppl; 1987 Mar; 670():840-5. PubMed ID: 11648564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. State ex rel. Jones v. Gerhardstein.
Wisconsin. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1987 Dec; 416():883-900. PubMed ID: 12041140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. United States v. Leatherman.
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
Fed Suppl; 1983 Oct; 580():977-81. PubMed ID: 11648498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bee v. Greaves.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Fed Report; 1984 Sep; 744():1387-97. PubMed ID: 11648528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
Cort RS
UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Jarvis v. Levine.
Minnesota. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1988 Jan; 418():139-50. PubMed ID: 12041142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rennie v. Klein.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1983 Oct; 720():266-77. PubMed ID: 11648483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Rogers v. Commissioner of Department of Mental Health.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk
Mass Rep Mass Supreme Judic Court; 1983 Nov; 390():489-513. PubMed ID: 12041109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rivers v. Katz.
New York. Court of Appeals
North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Jun; 495():337-45. PubMed ID: 12041209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
Knepper K
Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In re Jarvis.
Minnesota. Court of Appeals
Wests North West Rep; 1988 Dec; 433():120-4. PubMed ID: 12041143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Keyhea v. Rushen.
California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5
Wests Calif Report; 1986 Mar; 223():746-55. PubMed ID: 11648546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Mental Commitment of M.P.
Indiana. Court of Appeals, Second District
North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Nov; 500():216-28. PubMed ID: 12041210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Involuntary treatment: civilly committed patients may be involuntarily medicated; involuntary medication to restore competence to stand trial requires judicial approval.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):493-4. PubMed ID: 11645181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. United States Supreme Court and psychiatry: a critical look.
Malmquist CP
J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(1-2):137-64. PubMed ID: 11658821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
