These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648570)
21. A review of the Burger Court: Part I. Parry J Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Washington v. Harper. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Feb; 110():1028-56. PubMed ID: 12041281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In re Savage. New Jersey. Superior Court, Appellate Division Atl Report; 1989 May; 558():1357-63. PubMed ID: 11648581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Two Supreme Court rulings provide mentally ill defendants new protections. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Woodland v. Angus. U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D Fed Suppl; 1993 Mar; 820():1497-519. PubMed ID: 11648607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Williams v. Wilzack. Maryland. Court of Appeals Atl Report; 1990 May; 573():809-21. PubMed ID: 11648585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Rights within the therapeutic relationship. King P J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. United States v. Watson. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1990 Jan; 893():970-87. PubMed ID: 11648587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hightower v. Olmstead. U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division Fed Suppl; 1996 Sep; 959():1549-73. PubMed ID: 11648628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Civil commitment in Wisconsin: the impact of Lessard v. Schmidt. Zander TK Wis L Rev; 1976; 1976(2):503-62. PubMed ID: 11664748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Riese v. St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center. California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2 Wests Calif Report; 1988 Jan; 243():241-55. PubMed ID: 11648567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Jarvis v. Levine. Minnesota. Court of Appeals Wests North West Rep; 1987 Apr; 403():298-310. PubMed ID: 12041162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication? Dlugacz HA Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. In re Orr. Illinois. Appellate Court, Fourth District North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Nov; 531():64-75. PubMed ID: 12041254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reevaluating substantive due process as a source of protection for psychiatric patients to refuse drugs. Brooks WM Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(4):937-1017. PubMed ID: 15386905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. New York court says mentally ill have right to refuse medication. Gross J N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11646485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The administration of psychotropic drugs to prisoners: state of the law and beyond. Floyd J Calif Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 78(5):1243-85. PubMed ID: 11659407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Supreme Court rules mentally ill prison inmates may be involuntarily medicated. Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1990 May; 41(5):572. PubMed ID: 11642773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values. Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]