These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648582)
1. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1988 Jun; 686():1089-138. PubMed ID: 11648582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1991 Oct; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 Jun; 112():2791-885. PubMed ID: 12041291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1990 Aug; 744():1323-98. PubMed ID: 11648591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law. Berlin SI Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end? Henry KS Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. American College of Obstetricians v. Thornburgh. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1984 May; 737():283-319. PubMed ID: 11648491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 13 June 1988. United States. District Court, Eastern District of Pennyslvania Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():45. PubMed ID: 12289570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Planned Parenthood Association of Kansas City v. Ashcroft. U.S. Supreme Court U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1983 Jun; 462():476-505. PubMed ID: 12041276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process. Goldstein RD William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Barnes v. Mississippi. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Fed Report; 1993 May; 992():1335-47. PubMed ID: 11648616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence. Bigel AI Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1993 May; 822():227-39. PubMed ID: 11648410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Planned Parenthood Association v. Fitzpatrick. 4 Sep 1975. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1975; 401():554-94. PubMed ID: 11646052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Appeals court upholds limits for abortions. Hinds Md N Y Times Web; 1991 Oct; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Court gets stark arguments on abortion. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts v. Attorney General. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1997 Mar; 677():101-14. PubMed ID: 12041240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Workability of the undue burden test. Schneider EA Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Planned Parenthood Association of Kansas City v. Ashcroft. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1981 Jul; 655():848-78. PubMed ID: 11648459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]