These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648582)
21. Jones v. Smith. U.S. District Court, S.D. Florida Fed Suppl; 1979 Jul; 474():1160-72. PubMed ID: 11648523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Planned Parenthood v. Neely. U.S. District Court, D. Arizona Fed Suppl; 1992 Sep; 804():1210-8. PubMed ID: 11648614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law. Pirner RK; Williams LB Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Doe v. Zimmerman. 3 Dec 1975. U.S. District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1975; 405():534-41. PubMed ID: 11646051 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone? Kudner KE Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion. Kunz KA Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Jane L. v. Bangerter. U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D Fed Suppl; 1992 Dec; 809():865-80. PubMed ID: 11648409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. Thornburgh. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1987 Mar; 656():879-90. PubMed ID: 11648557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts v. Bellotti. U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Fed Report; 1989 Feb; 868():459-73. PubMed ID: 11648577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sojourner T v. Edwards. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Fed Report; 1992 Sep; 974():27-32. PubMed ID: 11648404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate. Simmons PD St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):467-88. PubMed ID: 11656618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Barnes v. Moore. U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Fed Report; 1992 Aug; 970():12-6. PubMed ID: 11648402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Demise of the trimester standard? City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc. Curry RE J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(2):267-86. PubMed ID: 11651847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth. 31 Jan 1975. U.S. District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D Fed Suppl; 1975; 392():1362-79. PubMed ID: 11646047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future. Joseph MA New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Jane L. v. Bangerter. U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Fed Report; 1995 Aug; 61():1493-505. PubMed ID: 11648625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Parental consent to abortion: how enforcement can vary. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11647920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Glick v. McKay. U.S. District Court, D. Nevada Fed Suppl; 1985 Jul; 616():322-8. PubMed ID: 11648357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment. Hatch OG Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]