These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648595)

  • 41. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
    Heller S
    Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Womens Services v. Thone.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1982 Oct; 690():667-9. PubMed ID: 11648362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. High court sets review on abortion.
    Barbash F
    Washington Post; 1982 May; ():A1, A7. PubMed ID: 11647754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Workability of the undue burden test.
    Schneider EA
    Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
    Wardle LD
    Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Planned Parenthood Association of Atlanta Area v. Miller.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
    Fed Report; 1991 Jun; 934():1462-82. PubMed ID: 11648400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Abortion rights of minors weighed.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov; ():B32. PubMed ID: 11647378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors.
    Schmidt CG
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 68(3):597-638. PubMed ID: 11659822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Should parents be notified of their minor daughter's abortion? A pregnant question for Florida legislators.
    Parsons CE
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1986; 14(3):719-43. PubMed ID: 11658962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The judicial portrayal of the physician in abortion and sterilization decisions: the use and abuse of medical discretion.
    Asaro A
    Harv Womens Law J; 1983; 6(1):51-102. PubMed ID: 11658431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
    Sourial WH
    Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Schools and abortion: a new debate.
    Terry D
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11646105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Understanding the United States Supreme Court's position on parental consent requirements: in defense of Danforth and Bellotti--a response to Crutchfield.
    Rodman H
    Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 11651712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Planned Parenthood Association of Utah v. Matheson.
    U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1983 Dec; 582():1001-9. PubMed ID: 11648209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Planned Parenthood Association of Atlanta Area v. Harris.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
    Fed Suppl; 1987 Sep; 670():971-98. PubMed ID: 11648379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Unemancipated minors' rights of access to contraceptives without parental consent or notice--the squeal rule and beyond.
    Best M
    Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 1983; 8(2):219-50. PubMed ID: 11658756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. For minors, abortion limits have side effects.
    Diesenhouse S
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Mar; ():E7. PubMed ID: 11647864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Justices deadlocked on state laws restricting minors' access to abortion.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Dec; ():B16. PubMed ID: 11646635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reproduction and the law.
    Erickson NS
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 11649200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Fargo Women's Health Organization v. Schafer.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1994 Feb; 18():526-40. PubMed ID: 11648623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.