These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648595)
61. Medicine and the law: treatment of minors--consent requirements. Young MG Tex Med; 1983 Jan; 79(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 6687501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power. Paul EW; Klassel D Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Constitutional law--Supreme Court is undecided on parental notification requirement for minor's abortion. McArthur JR S C Law Rev; 1980 Feb; 31(3):604-16. PubMed ID: 11665169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Who has the right to advise children on birth control? Gerber P; Rahemtula A Med J Aust; 1986 Apr; 144(8):419-23. PubMed ID: 3959972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. In re Moe. Massachusetts. Appeals Court, Worcester North East Rep Second Ser; 1987 Dec; 517():170-2. PubMed ID: 12041232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Constitutional law--parental and judicial consent restrictions on a minor's decision to have an abortion. Vozella PF Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1980; 14(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 11665156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. A technical knockout for parental notification. Fam Plann Perspect; 1987; 19(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 3556537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Parental notice statutes: permissible state regulation of a minor's abortion decision. Foye PJ Fordham Law Rev; 1980 Oct; 49(1):81-111. PubMed ID: 11658261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test. Farber DA; Nowak JE Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. Lawall. United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Wests Fed Rep; 1999; 180():1022-33. PubMed ID: 16477716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process. Goldstein RD William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Requiring parents' consent on abortion is upheld. N Y Times Web; 1993 May; ():28. PubMed ID: 11647939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone? Kudner KE Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Curbs for minors seeking abortion upheld on appeal. Taylor S N Y Times Web; 1988 Aug; ():A1, A13. PubMed ID: 11647390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennnsylvania v. Casey. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1992 Oct; 978():74-8. PubMed ID: 11648602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Fed Suppl; 1990 Aug; 744():1323-98. PubMed ID: 11648591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. The Constitution and the anomaly of the pregnant teenager. Buchanan E Ariz Law Rev; 1982; 24(3):553-610. PubMed ID: 11658425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]