These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648598)

  • 1. Anna J. v. Mark C.
    California. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 3
    Wests Calif Report; 1991 Oct; 286():369-82. PubMed ID: 11648598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In re Marriage of Buzzanca.
    California. Court of Appeal. Fourth District, Division 3
    Wests Calif Report; 1998 Mar; 72():280-94. PubMed ID: 11648442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anna J. v. Mark C.: proof of the imminent need for surrogate motherhood regulation.
    Smith BP
    J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(2):493-517. PubMed ID: 11659536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy.
    Hofheimer A
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In re Adoption of Matthew B.-M.
    California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3
    Wests Calif Report; 1991 Jul; 284():18-38. PubMed ID: 11648597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Jaycee B. v. Superior Court.
    California. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 3
    Rep Cases Determ Court Appeal State Calif; 1996 Feb; 42():718-32. PubMed ID: 12041102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are you my mother? A judge's decision in in vitro fertilization surrogacy.
    Seavello SF
    Hastings Womens Law J; 1992; 3(2):211-44. PubMed ID: 11659653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. McDonald v. McDonald.
    New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
    N Y Suppl Second Ser; 1994 Feb; 608():477-81. PubMed ID: 12041118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of legal parentage in egg donation, embryo transplantation, and gestational surrogacy arrangements.
    Goodwin A
    Fam Law Q; 1992; 26(3):275-91. PubMed ID: 11659602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parental rights and gestational surrogacy: an argument against the genetic standard.
    Russell-Brown SL
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1992; 23(2):525-54. PubMed ID: 11659610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. R.R. v. M.H.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1998 Jan; 689():790-7. PubMed ID: 12041242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A surrogacy issue: who is the other mother?
    Morgan D
    Int J Law Fam; 1994 Dec; 8(3):386-412. PubMed ID: 11659968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modern reproductive technology and motherhood: the search for common ground and the recognition of difference.
    Birck ML
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1994; 62(4):1623-57. PubMed ID: 11660067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surrogate denied custody of child.
    Mydans S
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Oct; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In re Baby M.
    New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division: Family Part, Bergen County
    Atl Report; 1988 Apr; 542():52-5. PubMed ID: 11648177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surrogate law: the decision in a novel case in New Jersey could have wide-reaching implications for infertile couples and surrogate motherhood.
    Galen M
    Natl Law J; 1986 Sep; 9(3):1, 8, 10. PubMed ID: 11658784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Who are the parents of biotechnological children?
    Palmer LI
    Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surrogacy legislation in California: proposals and commentary.
    Davis AD
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):571-92. PubMed ID: 11655175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In re Baby M.
    New Jersey. Supreme Court
    Atl Report; 1988 Feb; 537():1227-73. PubMed ID: 11648559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Doe v. Doe.
    Connecticut. Supreme Court
    Atl Report; 1998 Apr; 710():1297-337. PubMed ID: 11648441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.