257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648606)
1. Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland.
Great Britain. House of Lords
All Engl Law Rep; 1993 Feb; [1993]1():821-96. PubMed ID: 11648606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Withholding life-sustaining treatment: the ultimate decision.
Stone J
New Law J; 1994 Feb; 144(6635):205-6. PubMed ID: 11652805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Incompetent patient in PVS: views of relatives and "best interests": Re G.
Grubb A
Med Law Rev; 1995; 3(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 11656729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Decisions and responsibilities at the end of life: euthanasia and clinically assisted death.
Biggs H
Med Law Int; 1996; 2(3):229-45. PubMed ID: 11660677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Law Lords rule that Tony Bland does not create precedent.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1993 Feb; 306(6875):413-4. PubMed ID: 11643102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Declared innocent?
Bridgeman J
Med Law Rev; 1995; 3(2):117-41. PubMed ID: 11656731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Courting euthanasia?: Tony Bland and the Law Lords.
Keown J
Ethics Med; 1993; 9(3):34-7. PubMed ID: 11652743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Withdrawing treatment from patients in a persistent vegetative state.
Gerber P
Med J Aust; 1994 Dec 5-19; 161(11-12):715-7. PubMed ID: 11660024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The slippery slope.
Doyle K; Carroll A
New Law J; 1996 May; 146(6745):759-61. PubMed ID: 11657174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Doctors as gods.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1999 Jul; 319(7201):64. PubMed ID: 10390489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983).
Crook RR
Cumberland Law Rev; 1984-1985; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Tony Bland awaits final hearing.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1993 Jan; 306(6869):11-2. PubMed ID: 11643093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. House of Lords on care for dying.
Bull Med Ethics; 1994 Feb; No. 95():13-6. PubMed ID: 11652723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983).
Chrisman JP
Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Grace Plaza of Great Neck v. Elbaum.
New York. Court of Appeals
North East Rep Second Ser; 1993 Oct; 623():513-8. PubMed ID: 12041259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.
Feenan D
J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Barber v. Superior Court of State of California; Nejdl v. Superior Court of State of California.
California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2
Wests Calif Report; 1983 Oct; 195():484-94. PubMed ID: 11648259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dangers of the Bland decision.
Cole AP; Duddington JG
Bull Med Ethics; 1993 Feb; No. 85():2. PubMed ID: 11652203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Bland: crossing the Rubicon?
Finnis JM
Law Q Rev; 1993 Jul; 109():329-37. PubMed ID: 11652844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
