These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648620)
1. Whitlock v. Duke University. U.S. District Court, M.D. North Carolina, Durham Division Fed Suppl; 1986 Jun; 637():1463-76. PubMed ID: 11648620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hyperbaric research at Duke University--ethical considerations. Bennett PB; Kylstra JA Forsvarsmedicin; 1973; 9(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 11661280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Informed consent: the illusion of patient choice. Rice N Emory Law J; 1974; 23(2):503-22. PubMed ID: 11664432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Information for consent in human experimentation. Dickens BM Univ Tor Law J; 1974; 24(4):381-410. PubMed ID: 11664387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. 'Informed consent' to medical procedures. Skegg PD Med Sci Law; 1975; 15(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 11693128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Toward a theory of control of medical experimentation with human subjects: the role of compensation. Adams BR; Shea-Stonum M Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):604-48. PubMed ID: 11661167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The law governing human experimentation in Quebec. Kouri RP Rev Droit; 1991; 22(1):77-108. PubMed ID: 11659965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Structuring the issues in informed consent. Somerville MA McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):740-808. PubMed ID: 11650591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Marino v. Ballestas. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1984 Nov; 749():162-71. PubMed ID: 11648512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent in human experimentation: bridging the gap between ethical thought and current practice. Delgado R; Leskovac H UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):67-130. PubMed ID: 11659049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal and ethical considerations in hyperbaric research. Thornstedt H Forsvarsmedicin; 1973; 9(3):379-81. PubMed ID: 11661281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The standard of disclosure in human subject experimentation. Morin K J Leg Med; 1998 Jun; 19(2):157-221. PubMed ID: 9658739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Halley v. Birbiglia. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester Mass Rep Mass Supreme Judic Court; 1983 Dec; 390():540-50. PubMed ID: 12041108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent. Grubbs WG Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethics lapses at Duke halt dozens of human experiments. Hilts PJ; Stolberg SG N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11648115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects. Owens JF Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Contractual aspects of human medical experimentation. Dickens BM Univ Tor Law J; 1975; 25(4):406-38. PubMed ID: 11664537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Armauer Hansen and human leprosy transmission: medical ethics and legal rights. Blom K Int J Lepr; 1973; 41(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 11664287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patients, agents, and informed consent. Haber JG J Law Health; 1985-1986; 1():43-59.. PubMed ID: 11658933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Petty v. United States. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1984 Aug; 740():1428-42. PubMed ID: 11648488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]