These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648622)

  • 1. Doe v. Shalala.
    U.S. District Court, D. Maryland, Baltimore Division
    Fed Suppl; 1994 Sep; 862():1421-31. PubMed ID: 11648622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maryland court rules on embryo standing.
    Summer D
    J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):108. PubMed ID: 11644714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testimony before the NIH Human Embryo Research Panel.
    Irving DN
    Linacre Q; 1994 Nov; 61(4):82-9. PubMed ID: 11652834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Embryo research tests NIH's mettle.
    Gavaghan H
    Nat Med; 1995 Jan; 1(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 11644731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Embryo research: ethical issues.
    O'Rourke K
    Health Care Ethics USA; 1994; 2(4):2-3. PubMed ID: 11659931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bioethics, public policy, and political science.
    Carmen IH
    Politics Life Sci; 1994 Feb; 13(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 11654822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preimplantation embryos, research ethics, and public policy.
    Tauer CA
    Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(3):30-7. PubMed ID: 11653183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Report of the Human Embryo Research Panel.
    Green RM
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1995 Mar; 5(1):83-4. PubMed ID: 11645298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The present standing of the human embryo in U.S. law.
    Avila D
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(2):203-26. PubMed ID: 12854540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Embryo research panel ignites debate.
    Fackelmann KA
    Sci News; 1994 Oct; 146(14):212. PubMed ID: 11659875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new wave dialectic: the reinvention of human embryology.
    Kischer CW
    Linacre Q; 1994 Nov; 61(4):66-81. PubMed ID: 11652833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Panel to back fertility study is revived.
    Leary WE
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Jul; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Federal embryo research is backed: ethicists see benefits overriding qualms.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The politics of human-embryo research--avoiding ethical gridlock.
    Annas GJ; Caplan A; Elias S
    N Engl J Med; 1996 May; 334(20):1329-32. PubMed ID: 8609955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Creation "for research only".
    Patrick RM; Rosen E
    Hum Life Rev; 1995; 21(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 11653006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Embryos created for research purposes.
    Davis DS
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1995 Dec; 5(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 11645314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rules due on disputed embryo research.
    Angier N
    N Y Times Web; 1994 Sep; ():C1, C10. PubMed ID: 11647977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Law, policy and personhood in the context of the techniques of human experimentation in modern medicine.
    Hicks SC
    Cap Univ Law Rev; 1990; 19(2):255-99. PubMed ID: 11659475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Politicians squabble over stem-cell research.
    Rovner J
    Lancet; 1999 Jun; 353(9168):1948. PubMed ID: 11660637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bush policy on human stem cells faces new challenges.
    Wade N
    N Y Times Web; 2004 Mar; ():A18. PubMed ID: 15022669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.