These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648628)

  • 1. Hightower v. Olmstead.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
    Fed Suppl; 1996 Sep; 959():1549-73. PubMed ID: 11648628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In re Mental Commitment of M.P.
    Indiana. Court of Appeals, Second District
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Nov; 500():216-28. PubMed ID: 12041210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In re C.E.
    Illinois. Supreme Court
    Wests North East Rep; 1994 May; 641():345-60. PubMed ID: 12041179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Of the parens patriae commitment power and drug treatment of schizophrenia: do the benefits to the patient justify involuntary treatment?
    DuBose EZ
    Minn Law Rev; 1976 Jun; 60(6):1149-218. PubMed ID: 11664731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
    Knepper K
    Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. State ex rel. Jones v. Gerhardstein.
    Wisconsin. Supreme Court
    Wests North West Rep; 1987 Dec; 416():883-900. PubMed ID: 12041140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rivers v. Katz.
    New York. Court of Appeals
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Jun; 495():337-45. PubMed ID: 12041209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Public psychiatry and the right to refuse treatment: toward an effective damage remedy.
    Furrow BR
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1984; 19(1):21-60. PubMed ID: 11658667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Woodland v. Angus.
    U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1993 Mar; 820():1497-519. PubMed ID: 11648607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Madness and medicine: the forcible administration of psychotropic drugs.
    Beyer S
    Wis L Rev; 1980; 1980(3):497-567. PubMed ID: 11665228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Jarvis v. Levine.
    Minnesota. Supreme Court
    Wests North West Rep; 1988 Jan; 418():139-50. PubMed ID: 12041142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The right of the mentally ill to refuse treatment revisited.
    Slovenko R
    J Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(3):407-34. PubMed ID: 11659854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. United States v. Leatherman.
    U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
    Fed Suppl; 1983 Oct; 580():977-81. PubMed ID: 11648498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The biological alteration cases.
    Gelman S
    William Mary Law Rev; 1995 May; 36(4):1203-301. PubMed ID: 11660332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
    Roth LH
    Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of a mentally ill individual's right to refuse medication under the United States and the New York State constitutions.
    Brooks WM
    Touro Law Rev; 1991; 8(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 11659527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs.
    Hahn WA
    Creighton Law Rev; 1982-1983; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Jarvis v. Levine.
    Minnesota. Court of Appeals
    Wests North West Rep; 1987 Apr; 403():298-310. PubMed ID: 12041162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Washington v. Harper.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Feb; 110():1028-56. PubMed ID: 12041281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
    Cort RS
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.