These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648638)

  • 1. Okpalobi v. Foster.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Louisiana
    Fed Suppl; 1998 Jan; 981():977-88. PubMed ID: 11648638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Margaret S. v. Edwards.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1986 Jul; 794():994-1004. PubMed ID: 11648552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carhart v. Stenberg.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1999 Sep; 192():1142-52. PubMed ID: 11648438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Missouri, C.D.
    Fed Suppl; 1987 Apr; 662():407-30. PubMed ID: 11648378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evans v. Kelley.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
    Fed Suppl; 1997 Jul; 977():1283-320. PubMed ID: 11648432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eubanks v. Brown.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Kentucky
    Fed Suppl; 1984 Sep; 604():141-50. PubMed ID: 11648525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Causeway Medical Suite v. Ieyoub.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Louisiana
    Fed Suppl; 1995 Oct; 905():360-7. PubMed ID: 11648627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
    Parness JA
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Jane L. v. Bangerter.
    U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1992 Dec; 809():865-80. PubMed ID: 11648409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Missouri, C.D
    Fed Suppl; 1987 Mar; 655():1300-22. PubMed ID: 11648372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
    Buckley M
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. People v. Frey.
    Illinois. Supreme Court
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1973 Mar; 294():257-9. PubMed ID: 12041231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sojourner T v. Edwards.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1992 Sep; 974():27-32. PubMed ID: 11648404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eubanks v. Stengel.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Kentucky
    Fed Suppl; 1998 Nov; 28():1024-43. PubMed ID: 11648437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reexamining Roe: nineteenth-century abortion statutes and the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Witherspoon JS
    St Marys Law J; 1985; 17(1):29-71. PubMed ID: 11655872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Floyd v. Anders. 4 Nov 1977.
    U.S. District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division
    Fed Suppl; 1977; 440():535-40. PubMed ID: 11646007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preterm Cleveland v. Voinovich.
    Ohio. Court of Appeals, Franklin County
    Wests North East Rep; 1993 Jul; 627():570-92. PubMed ID: 12041182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hodgson v. Minnesota.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2926-72. PubMed ID: 12041294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utah Women's Clinic, Inc. v. Leavitt.
    U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D.
    Fed Suppl; 1994 Feb; 844():1482-95. PubMed ID: 11648412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
    Fed Suppl; 1993 May; 822():227-39. PubMed ID: 11648410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.