These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648638)

  • 21. Court gets stark arguments on abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin v. Doyle.
    U.S. District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
    Fed Suppl; 1998 Jun; 9():1033-46. PubMed ID: 11648428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Schulte v. Douglas.
    U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska
    Fed Suppl; 1981 Jul; 567():522-9. PubMed ID: 11648342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe.
    Rush SE
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Women's Medical Center of Providence v. Roberts.
    U.S. District Court, D. Rhode Island
    Fed Suppl; 1981 Apr; 512():316-25. PubMed ID: 11648519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1991 Oct; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Carhart v. Stenberg.
    U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska
    Fed Suppl; 1997 Aug; 972():507-31. PubMed ID: 11648431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Guam Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. Ada.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1992 Jun; 962():1366-74. PubMed ID: 11648405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
    Berlin SI
    Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. New York State National Organization for Women v. Terry.
    U.S. District Court, S.D. New York
    Fed Suppl; 1989 Jan; 704():1247-64. PubMed ID: 11648386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Planned Parenthood of Minnesota v. State.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1990 Aug; 910():479-88. PubMed ID: 11648398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The born alive doctrine: a legal anachronism.
    Westerfield L
    South Univ Law Rev; 1976; 2(2):149-73. PubMed ID: 12083087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?
    Barber RA
    Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible.
    Law SA
    Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life.
    Parness JA; Pritchard SK
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Birth Control Centers, Inc. v. Reizen.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1984 Aug; 743():352-69. PubMed ID: 11648349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Planned Parenthood Association of Cincinnati v. City of Cincinnati.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1987 Jul; 822():1390-406. PubMed ID: 11648375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An analysis of the 1974 Massachusetts Abortion Statute and a minor's right to abortion.
    Malfa KA
    New Engl Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):417-54. PubMed ID: 11664438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.