117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648657)
1. Transfusion refusal ruled mother's right.
Colen BD
Washington Post; 1974 Apr; ():B1+. PubMed ID: 11648657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A pregnant mother's right to refuse treatment beneficial to her fetus: refusing blood transfusions.
Filkins JA
DePaul J Health Care Law; 1998; 2(2):361-83. PubMed ID: 11658074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Their life is in the blood: Jehovah's Witnesses, blood transfusions and the courts.
Moore ML
North KY Law Rev; 1983; 10(2):281-304. PubMed ID: 11649715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. Jackson: a recurring dilemma for health care providers in the treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses.
Bamberger DH
MD Law Rev; 1987; 46(3):514-32. PubMed ID: 11649934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Baby born to woman without transfusion.
Cohn V
Washington Post; 1974 Apr; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11648937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusion.
Watson SB
Clin Ethics Rep; 1991; 5(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 11653954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Jehovah's Witness/blood transfusion dilemma.
O'Donnell TJ
Med Moral Newsl; 1982 Sep; 19(7):25-8. PubMed ID: 11649506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Forced medication: by whose right?
Paris JJ
America (NY); 1975 Nov; 133(15):323-5. PubMed ID: 11664563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Religious beliefs and life saving therapy.
O'Rourke K
Health Care Ethics USA; 1997; 5(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11654840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Wons v. Public Health Trust of Dade County.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 11644332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Compulsory medical treatment and religious freedom: whose law shall prevail?
Paris JJ
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 11661287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mercy Hospital v. Jackson.
Maryland. Court of Appeals
Atl Report; 1986 Jun; 510():562-8. PubMed ID: 11648170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Karen Quinlan case--a constitutional right to die?
Roddy JV
Chicago Bar Rec; 1976; 58(3):120-124+. PubMed ID: 11661598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In the Matter of Bentley. 25 Apr 1974.
District of Columbia. Superior Court
Dly Wash Law Report; 1974; 102(117):1221+, 17 Jun 1974. PubMed ID: 11645919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Right to refuse blood transfusion.
Rubsamen DS
Med World News; 1974 Apr; 15(17):58. PubMed ID: 11661074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Freedom of religion versus civil authority in matters of health.
Flowers RB
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci; 1979 Nov; 446():149-61. PubMed ID: 11651749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Blood transfusions, Jehovah's Witnesses and the rule of inviolability of the human body.
Kouri RP
Rev Droit; 1974; 5():156-76. PubMed ID: 11662988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in policy of refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses. Jehovah's Witnesses respect patients' autonomy.
Wade P
BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7294):1124. PubMed ID: 11360912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The approach to the Jehovah's Witness patient.
Rothenberg DM
Anesthesiol Clin North Am; 1990 Sep; 8(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 11653928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Compulsory medical treatment of children: rights in conflict.
Dalcanton CL
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1973; 35(2):369-81. PubMed ID: 11664300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
