These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648683)

  • 1. Court curbs family veto on abortion.
    MacKenzie JP
    Washington Post; 1976 Jul; ():A1+. PubMed ID: 11648683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The consent question--parental and spousal consent for abortions.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1976 Sep; 32(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11664739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy.
    Long SL; Ravenscraft P
    Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth. 31 Jan 1975.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D
    Fed Suppl; 1975; 392():1362-79. PubMed ID: 11646047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constitutional law: further guidelines for abortion legislation.
    Oklahoma Law Rev; 1976; 29(3):785-8. PubMed ID: 11664737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The validity of parental consent statutes after Planned Parenthood.
    Talbert JT
    J Urban Law; 1977; 54(1):127-64. PubMed ID: 11664823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abortion statutes after Danforth: an examination.
    Moss GW
    J Fam Law; 1976; 15(3):537-67. PubMed ID: 11663802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High court sets review on abortion.
    Barbash F
    Washington Post; 1982 May; ():A1, A7. PubMed ID: 11647754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion and privacy: a woman's right to self determination.
    Kraus AR
    Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1978; 10(1):173-93. PubMed ID: 11664982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment.
    Hatch OG
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Third party consent to abortions before and after Danforth: a theoretical analysis.
    Schell MS
    J Fam Law; 1976; 15(3):508-36. PubMed ID: 11663801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
    Pirner RK; Williams LB
    Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constitutional law -- Fifth Circuit holds that requiring the consent of both parents does not unduly burden a minor's right to abortion -- Barnes v. Mississippi.
    Jackson CP
    Temple Law Rev; 1994; 67(4):1357-86. PubMed ID: 11660074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spousal notification and consent in abortion situations: Scheinberg v. Smith.
    Wiemers D
    Houst Law Rev; 1982 Jul; 19(5):1025-39. PubMed ID: 11658560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence.
    Bigel AI
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of state abortion laws enacted since January 1973.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1975 Dec; 4(6):108-13. PubMed ID: 11664490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Supreme Court says spouse, parent can't block abortion.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1976 Aug; 5(4):53-7. PubMed ID: 11664665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
    Berlin SI
    Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding the United States Supreme Court's position on parental consent requirements: in defense of Danforth and Bellotti--a response to Crutchfield.
    Rodman H
    Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 11651712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Supreme Court to review abortion consent law.
    Goren T
    Ob Gyn News; 1978 Dec; 13(24):3+. PubMed ID: 11665058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.