These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648742)
1. Lawyers upset at ruling psychiatrist must testify. Bercovici L Washington Post; 1979 Mar; ():C1+. PubMed ID: 11648742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Confidentiality and the "dangerous" patient: implications of Tarasoff for psychiatrists and lawyers. Merton V Emory Law J; 1982; 31(2):263-343. PubMed ID: 11653483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychotherapy and confidentiality. Slovenko R Clevel State Law Rev; 1975; 24(3):375-96. PubMed ID: 11661273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Wrongful disclosure of health information. N Z Med J; 1995 Jul; 108(1003):281-2. PubMed ID: 11644722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Confidentiality and the psychiatrist in private practice. Ellard J Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1970 Dec; 4(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 5286781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical and psychotherapy privileges and confidentiality: on giving with one hand and removing with the other. Smith SR KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(3):473-557. PubMed ID: 11651896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Tarasoff, myth and reality: an empirical study of private law in action. Givelber DJ; Bowers WJ; Blitch CL Wis L Rev; 1984; 1984(2):443-97. PubMed ID: 11653756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychotherapy and privileged communications in child custody cases. Knapp SJ; Vandecreek L Prof Psychol Res Pr; 1985 Jun; 16(3):398-407. PubMed ID: 11650745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pennsylvania psychiatrist vindicated in refusing judge's request for records. Sadoff RL Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1979 Feb; 7(2):38-9. PubMed ID: 431274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of empathy in forensic examinations. Shuman DW Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(3 and 4):289-302. PubMed ID: 11659813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Child abuse reporting in New York State: the dilemma of the mental health professional. Agatstein DJ NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1989; 34(1):115-68. PubMed ID: 11650980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Duty to third parties, dangerousness, and the right to refuse treatment: problematic concepts for psychiatrist and lawyer. Griffith EJ; Griffith EE Calif West Law Rev; 1978; 14(2):241-74. PubMed ID: 11664963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The psychotherapist-patient privilege: a therapeutic jurisprudence view. Winick BJ Univ Miami Law Rev; 1996 Jan; 50(2):249-65. PubMed ID: 11660321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Behind closed doors: the confidentiality of psychotherapeutic records in Medicaid fraud investigations. Bassano PN Pace Law Rev; 1986; 6(3):441-94. PubMed ID: 11649846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Privileges and professionals: lawyers and psychiatrists. Saltzburg SA Va Law Rev; 1980 Apr; 66(3):597-65l. PubMed ID: 11649386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. AIDS, therapeutic confidentiality, and warning third parties. Hermann DH; Gagliano RD MD Law Rev; 1989; 48(1):55-76. PubMed ID: 11650321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Constitutional privacy in psychotherapy. Smith SR George Washington Law Rev; 1980 Nov; 49(1):1-60. PubMed ID: 11658268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical confidentiality--who protects the victims? Hunter TH Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1977 Apr; 40(2):24-9. PubMed ID: 11661471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Untangling Tarasoff: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. Seligman BS Hastings Law J; 1977 Sep; 29(1):179-210. PubMed ID: 11661581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]