These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648744)

  • 1. Supreme Court enters quarrel over Laetrile.
    Mintz M
    Washington Post; 1979 Jan; ():A1+. PubMed ID: 11648744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laetrile: statutory and constitutional limitations on the regulation of ineffective drugs.
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1978 Nov; 127(1):233-72. PubMed ID: 11661627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laetrile and the privacy right in decisional responsibility.
    Volzer HJ
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1980; 27(4):395-429. PubMed ID: 11662802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laetrile: the battle moves into the courtroom.
    Schwartz RL
    Am Bar Assoc J; 1979 Feb; 65():224-8. PubMed ID: 11661617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The uncertain application of the right of privacy in personal medical decisions: the Laetrile cases.
    Christensen J
    Ohio State Law J; 1981; 42(2):523-50. PubMed ID: 11649547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Administrative law... Laetrile and other drugs to be used by the terminally ill are not exempt from the safety and effectiveness requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938.
    Shishkovsky KR
    J Urban Law; 1980; 57(2):364-88. PubMed ID: 11662840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why Laetrile won't go away.
    Edson L
    N Y Times Mag; 1977 p 41+; 27 Nov 1977():. PubMed ID: 11662576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regulating Laetrile: constitutional and statutory implications.
    Patton-Hulce VR
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1980; 5(1):155-76. PubMed ID: 11661910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. U.S. Laetrile ban backed.
    Mintz M
    Washington Post; 1979 Jun; ():A1+. PubMed ID: 11648764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. United States v. Rutherford. 18 Jun 1979.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1979; 442():544-59. PubMed ID: 12038357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laetrile, the continuing controversy.
    Carbone A
    Hosp Formul; 1978 Aug; 13(8):589-91. PubMed ID: 11645661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Freedom of choice in medical treatment: reconsidering the efficacy requirement of the FDCA.
    Clinite BJ
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1977; 9(1):205-26. PubMed ID: 11661566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High court ducks two issues, leaving Laetrile unchecked.
    Med World News; 1979 Jul; 20(14):17+. PubMed ID: 11645407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The judicial dilemma of Laetrile and a possible solution.
    Pendergast WR
    Mercer Law Rev; 1979; 30(3):573-84. PubMed ID: 11661827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laetrile wins one in federal court.
    Med World News; 1978 Aug; 19(16):25. PubMed ID: 11645367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RU 486 and the politics of drug regulation in the United States and France.
    Kramnick RK
    Cornell Int Law J; 1992; 25():667-718. PubMed ID: 11656340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Private rights to adulterated/misbranded articles.
    McMonagle L
    AIDS Public Policy J; 1987; 2(2):33-49. PubMed ID: 11650029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Drugs--Federal Drug Administration ban on Laetrile treatments for terminally ill cancer patients is arbitrary and capricious.
    Bitting TH
    Tulsa Law J; 1978; 14():222-5. PubMed ID: 11662799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laetrile: may the state intervene on behalf of a minor?
    Ainsworth MV; Wall T
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1982; 30(3):409-28. PubMed ID: 12083079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Laetrile controversy: freedom of choice in medicines urged.
    Link M
    Congr Q Wkly Rep; 1977 Jul; 35(27):1346-8. PubMed ID: 11661613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.