These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648751)

  • 1. U.S. panel's review of Laetrile produces inconclusive results.
    Wall St J (East Ed); 1978 Sep; ():18. PubMed ID: 11648751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laetrile, the continuing controversy.
    Carbone A
    Hosp Formul; 1978 Aug; 13(8):589-91. PubMed ID: 11645661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why Laetrile won't go away.
    Edson L
    N Y Times Mag; 1977 p 41+; 27 Nov 1977():. PubMed ID: 11662576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regulating Laetrile: constitutional and statutory implications.
    Patton-Hulce VR
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1980; 5(1):155-76. PubMed ID: 11661910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. U.S. to study Laetrile records.
    Colen BD
    Washington Post; 1978 Jan; ():A1+. PubMed ID: 11648727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The judicial dilemma of Laetrile and a possible solution.
    Pendergast WR
    Mercer Law Rev; 1979; 30(3):573-84. PubMed ID: 11661827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laetrile: the battle moves into the courtroom.
    Schwartz RL
    Am Bar Assoc J; 1979 Feb; 65():224-8. PubMed ID: 11661617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters.
    van Eys J; Levine RJ
    IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The uncertain application of the right of privacy in personal medical decisions: the Laetrile cases.
    Christensen J
    Ohio State Law J; 1981; 42(2):523-50. PubMed ID: 11649547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Laetrile controversy: background and issues.
    Eddy CH
    Ariz Law Rev; 1978; 20(3):825-60. PubMed ID: 11662772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gene dream fades away.
    Coghlan A
    New Sci; 1995 Nov; 148(2005):14-5. PubMed ID: 11656474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Federal agency keeps review committee after public comments support continuation.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1997 Jan; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overseeing regulations or intimidating researchers?
    Wax ML; Capron AM
    IRB; 1981 Apr; 3(4):8-12. PubMed ID: 11661947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The war on cancer.
    Hawkins P
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Oct; 127(148):S11610-8. PubMed ID: 11658344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laetrile: should it be banned?
    Clark Me
    Newsweek; 1977 Jun; 89(26):48-53+. PubMed ID: 11661577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board.
    Levine C; Caplan AL
    IRB; 1986; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Deschamps Report: controls for clinical research in Quebec.
    Miller J
    J Int Bioethique; 1997; 8(1-2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11655382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laetrile or amygdalin therapy; approval of new drug applications; duration of section.
    California
    Wests Annot Calif Codes Calif; 1982; Section 26681 added 1980():. PubMed ID: 12041473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laetrile and the privacy right in decisional responsibility.
    Volzer HJ
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1980; 27(4):395-429. PubMed ID: 11662802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.