These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648821)
1. Why a code of practice is needed for genetic engineering. Times (Lond); 1975 Aug; ():19. PubMed ID: 11648821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The nucleus family. Blumenthal S Stud Lawyer; 1978 Sep; 7(1):24-27+. PubMed ID: 11662505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Which ills to bear?: reevaluating the "threat" of modern genetics. Capron AM Emory Law J; 1990; 39(3):665-96. PubMed ID: 11653905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The gene doctors. Schulman R; Carson T; Norman JR; Therrien L Bus Week; 1985 Nov; No. 2921():76-80. PubMed ID: 11651796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Human cloning? Don't just say no. Macklin R US News World Rep; 1997 Mar; 122(9):64. PubMed ID: 11645340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Human gene therapy research: technological temptations and social control. Baram M; Proctor S; Andalman R; van Eyl D Genetic Resour; 1993; 7(2):10-5. PubMed ID: 11656942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fetal experimentation and federal regulation. Horan DJ Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 22(2):325-56. PubMed ID: 11664796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Human experimentation: the regulation controversy. Society; 1975; 13(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11662982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Federal regulation of fetal research: toward a public policy founded onethical reasoning. Markey K Univ Miami Law Rev; 1977; 31(3):675-96. PubMed ID: 11664834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An evolutionary perspective for genetic engineering. Sinsheimer RL New Sci; 1977 Jan; 73(1035):150-2. PubMed ID: 11663720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research on prisoners: why not? Levine RJ IRB; 1982 May; 4(5):6. PubMed ID: 11649409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An ethical evaluation of federal norms for fetal experimentation. O'Rourke KD Linacre Q; 1976 Feb; 43(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11663671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal research IV: the living fetus and the law--the state's role. Kindregan CP Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(4):133-44. PubMed ID: 11663566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The still forbidden fruit. Meilaender G Christ Today; 1977 Jan; 21(8):16-9. PubMed ID: 11661449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fears mount for gene scrutiny as watchdog faces axe. Kiernan V New Sci; 1996 Jun; 150(2033):10. PubMed ID: 11656540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The fetus as guinea pig. Scarf M N Y Times Mag; 1975 p 13+; 19 Oct 1975():. PubMed ID: 11664465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. International regulation of deliberate release biotechnologies. McGarity TO Tex Int Law J; 1991; 26(3):423-62. PubMed ID: 11651396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New protection for the unborn child. Nelson JR Christ Century; 1975 Aug 20-27; 92(27):725-6. PubMed ID: 11664651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]