These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648842)
1. College community votes curb on genetic research. Schumacher E Washington Post; 1977 Feb; ():A2. PubMed ID: 11648842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cambridge, Mass., council sets up DNA review. Norman C Sci Gov Rep; 1976 Aug; 6(13):4-6. PubMed ID: 11661417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New debate as NIH issues genetic guidelines... Cambridge mayor opposes new Harvard lab. Norman C Sci Gov Rep; 1976 Jul; 6(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 11661416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Corporate responsibility for recombinant DNA activities. Berger BA Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):913-24. PubMed ID: 11649592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reasonableness versus rationality in the construction and justification of science policy decisions: the case of the Cambridge Experimentation Review Board. Waddell C Sci Technol Human Values; 1989; 14(1):7-25. PubMed ID: 11650830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Recombinant DNA: a case study in regulation of scientific research. Chalfant JC; Hartmann ME; Blakeboro A Ecol Law Q; 1979; 8(1):55-129. PubMed ID: 11665069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The gene-ing of America. Ryser J Tex Mon; 1976 Dec; 4(12):178+. PubMed ID: 11661915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An unprecedented debate. Norman C Nature; 1977 Feb; 265(5595):575-7. PubMed ID: 11643373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fruits of gene-juggling: blessing or curse? Med World News; 1976 Oct; 17(21):45+. PubMed ID: 11661341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Recombinant DNA research: a debate on the benefits and risks. Davis BD; Chargaff E; Krimsky S Chem Eng News; 1977 May; 55(22):26-42. PubMed ID: 11661587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Recombinant DNA meets the Cambridge City Council. Sci News; 1976 Jul; 110(3):36. PubMed ID: 11661363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Introduction to recombinant DNA research, development and evolution of the NIH guidelines, and proposed legislation. Talbot B Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):804-14. PubMed ID: 11649587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Can scientists be trusted on hazardous research? Fields CM Chron High Educ; 1976 Aug; 12(21):4-5. PubMed ID: 11661340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific progress and the common good: the dilemma of recombinant DNA. Schachter H Leg Med Q; 1977 Mar; 1(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 11645436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetics research guidelines set up in Cambridge. McBride SD Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 1977 Jan; ():13. PubMed ID: 11648856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Gene transplants stir communities' fears; scientists are split. Gumpert D Wall St J (East Ed); 1976 Sep; ():1+. PubMed ID: 11649045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. DNA research curbs: compromise at Cambridge. Norman C Sci Gov Rep; 1977 Jan; 7(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 11661392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Law vs. science: legal control of genetic research. Becker F KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):880-94. PubMed ID: 11661534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]