These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649080)
1. Court voids state curb on abortion. Mintz M Washington Post; 1979 Jan; ():A1+. PubMed ID: 11649080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The abortion cases. Rust ME ABA J; 1986 Feb; 72():50-3. PubMed ID: 11655726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion: 'settling' the issue. Will GF Washington Post; 1979 Jan; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11649082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. State regulation of late abortion and the physician's duty of care to the viable fetus. Wood MA; Hawkins LB Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(3):394-422. PubMed ID: 11664113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right? Barber RA Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical responsibility for fetal survival under Roe and Doe. Sendor BB Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):444-71. PubMed ID: 11663614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence. Buckley M NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Missouri's unusual deterrent to abortion fails to get a hearing at the Supreme Court. Mintz M Washington Post; 1979 Mar; ():A2. PubMed ID: 11648985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention. MacDougal D; Nasser WP Haw Bar J; 1975; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion: are medicine and the law on a collision course? Pollner F Med World News; 1985 Jul; 26(13):66-68, 70, 73+. PubMed ID: 11645557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion choice and the law in Vermont: a recent study. Olmstead FH Vt Law Rev; 1982; 7(2):281-313. PubMed ID: 11655820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. "Social abortion" pre and post Webster. Bannon AE; Nigro SA State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):9-19. PubMed ID: 11655955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The legal impact of the Roe and Doe decisions. Granfield D Jurist; 1973; 33(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 11663427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe. Rush SE Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The aftermath of Casey: is a sonogram requirement unduly burdensome? Trense CF Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():225-41. PubMed ID: 11659925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Roe! Doe! Where are you?: the effect of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions. Satris MJ Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():432-56. PubMed ID: 11661108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Roe v. Wade: some definitional considerations. Nolan-Haley JM; Hilgers TW Hum Life Rev; 1977; 3(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11662326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]