These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649080)

  • 21. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion.
    Prall S
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
    Parness JA
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
    Linton PB
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Abortion: the Court's intellectual scandal.
    Will GF
    Washington Post; 1983 Jun; ():B7. PubMed ID: 11647350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Survey of abortion law.
    Platt JG; O'Malley K
    Ariz State Law J; 1980; 1980(1):67-216. PubMed ID: 11655392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The future of abortion.
    McDaniel A
    Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Court kills law calling late abortions murder.
    Med World News; 1979 Feb; 20(3):85-6. PubMed ID: 11645393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
    Chemerinsky E
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Killing "the handicapped" -- before and after birth.
    Field MA
    Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():79-138. PubMed ID: 11652872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment.
    Hatch OG
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Supreme Court says spouse, parent can't block abortion.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1976 Aug; 5(4):53-7. PubMed ID: 11664665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
    Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. State protection of the viable unborn child after Roe v. Wade: how little, how late?
    Rees G
    LA Law Rev; 1976; 37(1):270-82. PubMed ID: 11663713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is the Court rethinking abortion?
    Marcus R; Kamen A
    Washington Post; 1985 May; ():C5. PubMed ID: 11647357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Missouri loses latest round in battle over permissible abortion regulations.
    Baldwin ML
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 50(3):320-39. PubMed ID: 11658633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last?
    Casurella JG; Schrock CT
    Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Supreme Court dismisses an abortion case.
    N Y Times Web; 1986 May; ():B8. PubMed ID: 11647371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stringent curbs on abortion pass in Pennsylvania.
    Hinds Md
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Oct; ():A1, A26. PubMed ID: 11647417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the legal status of the proposition that "life begins at conception.
    Rubenfeld J
    Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Feb; 43(3):599-635. PubMed ID: 11645689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Pennsylvania abortion case.
    Benshoof J
    Touro Law Rev; 1993; 9(2):217-49. PubMed ID: 11656382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.