These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649085)
21. Abortion policy in the post-Webster age. Halva-Neubauer G Publius; 1990; 20(3):27-44. PubMed ID: 11656128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The phenomenon of antique laws: can a state revive old abortion laws in a new era? Plave EF George Washington Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 58(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 11656013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A wink from the bench: the federal courts and abortion. Uddo BJ Tulane Law Rev; 1979 Feb; 53(2):398-464. PubMed ID: 11665104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Abortion foes win vote in the House on funds for poor. Clymer A N Y Times Web; 1993 Jul; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The selective funding problem: abortions and religious schools. McConnell MW Harv Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 104(5):989-1050. PubMed ID: 11656068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. State constitutions: the new battlefield for abortion rights. Steinschneider J Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():284-94. PubMed ID: 11649953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy. Chemerinsky E Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The Supreme Court, abortion policy, and state response: a preliminary analysis. Nicholson JB; Steward DW Publius; 1978; 8(1):159-78. PubMed ID: 11664024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The Human Life Federalism Amendment: an assessment. Caron WR Cathol Lawyer; 1982; 27(2):87-111. PubMed ID: 11655614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. A critique of the abortion funding decisions: on private rights in the public sector. Goldstein LF Hastings Constit Law Q; 1981; 8(2):313-42. PubMed ID: 11655390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Constitutional law--state action--private hospitals receiving Hill-Burton funds do not act under color of state authority in denying access to their facilities for abortions. Roberts CC Georgetown Law J; 1974 Jul; 62(6):1783-93. PubMed ID: 11663482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Implications of the abortion decisions: post Roe and Doe litigation and legislation. Wasserman R Columbia Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 74(2):237-68. PubMed ID: 11664412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Teens left with many options despite 'squeal rule'. Ob Gyn News; 1983 Jul 1-14; 18(13):36. PubMed ID: 11658369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. House Joint Resolution 372: the Human Life Federalism Amendment. Ashbrook JM Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Dec; 127(185):H9407-9. PubMed ID: 11652376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Limiting public funds for abortions: state response to Congressional action. Dickinson TM Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):923-59. PubMed ID: 11664055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Abortion: state action. Womens Rights Law Report; 1977; 3(3-4):162-9. PubMed ID: 11663757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Toward a more perfect union: a federal cause of action for physician aid-in-dying. Robichaud TD Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1994; 27(2):521-64. PubMed ID: 11656405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment. Hatch OG Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]