These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649162)

  • 21. Restrictions on women's right to abortion: informed consent, spousal consent, and record keeping provisions.
    Karg B
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1978; 5(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 11665035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Abortion: the future cases--fathers' rights.
    Avansino F
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):472-92. PubMed ID: 11664407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Third party consent to abortions before and after Danforth: a theoretical analysis.
    Schell MS
    J Fam Law; 1976; 15(3):508-36. PubMed ID: 11663801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Consent provisions in abortion statutes.
    Levitz KB
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(4):645-62. PubMed ID: 11664386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Right to life of the unborn.
    Garn Je
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Jan; 127(12):S567-78. PubMed ID: 11665256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Human rights, abortion and the law.
    Sharkey PW
    Philos Res Analysis; 1978; 7(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 11663853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sex as contract: abortion and expanded choice.
    Feaver PD; Kling R; Plofchan TK
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1992-1993 Winter; 4():211-20. PubMed ID: 11652652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Constitutional law--right to privacy--spousal consent to abortion: foreshadowing the fall of parental consent.
    Kenworthy L
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 9(3):841-72. PubMed ID: 11664519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Massachusetts husbands unentitled to abortion veto.
    Hedgepeth JH
    Hosp Med Staff; 1974 Sep; 3(9):15-20. PubMed ID: 11664374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Poe v. Gerstein.
    Sanders AD
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):531-47. PubMed ID: 11664627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Court curbs family veto on abortion.
    MacKenzie JP
    Washington Post; 1976 Jul; ():A1+. PubMed ID: 11648683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The right to an abortion--problems with parental and spousal consent.
    Goldbach V
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1976; 22(1):65-86. PubMed ID: 11664694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Woman's right to have abortion without consent of, or against objections of, child's father.
    Shipley WE
    Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1975; 62():1097-100. PubMed ID: 12085878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The father's rights in the abortion decision.
    Schultz WL
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1975; 6(3):1075-94. PubMed ID: 11664508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The right of a husband or a minor's parent to participate in the abortion decision.
    Judson SH
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1973; 28(1):251-6. PubMed ID: 11664356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements violate right to privacy in abortion decision.
    Sanders JE
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 24(2):446-62. PubMed ID: 11664628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. doe v. Doe: the wife's right to an abortion over her husband's objections.
    Forman HM
    New Engl Law Rev; 1975; 11(1):205-24. PubMed ID: 11664560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spousal notification and consent in abortion situations: Scheinberg v. Smith.
    Wiemers D
    Houst Law Rev; 1982 Jul; 19(5):1025-39. PubMed ID: 11658560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Abortion and privacy: a woman's right to self determination.
    Kraus AR
    Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1978; 10(1):173-93. PubMed ID: 11664982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Constitutional law--abortion--court focuses on husband's interest regarding spousal notification requirement to procure abortion: Scheinberg v. Smith, 659 F.2d 746 (5th Cir. 1981).
    Adams C
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1982-1983; 13(1):143-59. PubMed ID: 11658434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.