These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649188)

  • 1. Random-sampling: a modest proposal for reforming IRB review.
    Caplan AL
    IRB; 1982; 4(6):8. PubMed ID: 11649188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientific design, ethics, and monitoring: iRB review of randomized clinical trials.
    Corwan DH
    IRB; 1980 Nov; 2(9):1-4. PubMed ID: 11661884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical and legal considerations in dental caries research involving human subjects.
    Branson R
    J Dent Res; 1980 Jul; 59(Special Issue C):1214-364. PubMed ID: 11651755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How can an IRB avoid the use of obsolete consent forms?
    Adkinson NF; Starklauf BL; Blake DA
    IRB; 1983; 5(1):10. PubMed ID: 11649510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The changing clinical trials scene: the role of the IRB.
    Mitchell SC; Steingrub J
    IRB; 1988; 10(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11650078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An IRB-approved protocol on the use of human fetal tissue.
    Levine RJ
    IRB; 1989; 11(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 11650174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human subject research review in the Department of Defense.
    Winter PE
    IRB; 1984; 6(3):9-10. PubMed ID: 11649568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A protocol review guide to reduce IRB inconsistency.
    Prentice ED; Antonson DL
    IRB; 1987; 9(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11649892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuing IRB review when research activity is limited to routine follow-up evaluations.
    Amdur RJ; Bankert E
    IRB; 1997; 19(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 11654739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters.
    van Eys J; Levine RJ
    IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical issues in nursing research: access to human subjects.
    Scott DW
    Top Clin Nurs; 1982 Apr; 4(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11649725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. IRB review as a "cooling out" device.
    Levine M; Lathrop VG
    IRB; 1983; 5(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. IRB jurisdiction and limits on IRB actions.
    Hershey N; Cann CI; Rothman KJ
    IRB; 1985; 7(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multicenter trials and subject eligibility: should local IRBs play a role?
    Freedman B
    IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. IRBs and randomized clinical trials.
    Meinert CL
    IRB; 1998; 20(2-3):9-12. PubMed ID: 11656915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Much more research to fall under IRB review.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jul; 14(7):3. PubMed ID: 11658059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The history of institutional review boards.
    Sherman M; Van Vleet JD
    Regul Aff J; 1991; 3():615-27. PubMed ID: 11651491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Protection of human subjects.
    United States
    Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethics in evolution.
    Huston P
    CMAJ; 1996 Aug; 155(4):363. PubMed ID: 11654512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revising human subjects policy: an example of consensual decision-making.
    Cohen JM; Hedberg WB
    J Soc Res Adm; 1984; 15(4):29-34. PubMed ID: 11649707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.