These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649249)
1. Baby M reconsidered. Areen J Georgetown Law J; 1988 Jun; 76(5):1741-58. PubMed ID: 11649249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The case for enforcement of the surrogate contract. Hill JL Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):147-60. PubMed ID: 11650306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Status and contract in surrogate motherhood: an illumination of the surrogacy debate. Dolgin JL Buffalo Law Rev; 1990; 38(2):515-50. PubMed ID: 11650993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal aspects of artificial human reproduction: can the law afford to play ostrich? Clapshaw D Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 4(3):254-72. PubMed ID: 11658651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Baby-sitting consideration: surrogate mother's right to "rent her womb" for a fee. Sly KM Gonzaga Law Rev; 1982-1983; 18(3):539-65. PubMed ID: 11658877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The surrogate mother contract: in the best interests of society? Latourette AW Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1990; 25(1):53-92. PubMed ID: 11651389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prohibiting payments to surrogate mothers: love's labor lost and the constitutional right to privacy. Bradley TS John Marshall Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):715-45. PubMed ID: 11650095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Regulating confidentiality of surrogacy records: lessons from the adoption experience. Smith P J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Winter; 31(1):65-103. PubMed ID: 11656450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legislative regulation of surrogacy and reproductive technology. Shultz MM Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):613-25. PubMed ID: 11655178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Surrogate motherhood contracts: should the British or Canadian model fill the U.S. legislative vacuum? Serratelli A George Washington J Int Law Econ; 1993; 26(3):633-74. PubMed ID: 11652952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In the matter of Baby M: rejudged. Raymond JG Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 11650375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Privacy, surrogacy, and the Baby M case. Allen AL Georgetown Law J; 1988 Jun; 76(5):1759-92. PubMed ID: 11649250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surrogate mother agreements: contemporary legal aspects of a biblical notion. Townsend MD Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1982; 16(2):467-83. PubMed ID: 11658708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Seven-week trial touched many basic emotions. Hanley R N Y Times Web; 1987 Apr; ():B2. PubMed ID: 11646174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Perspectives on surrogate motherhood. Little MO Med Humanit Rev; 1995; 9(2):38-45. PubMed ID: 11653303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How (not) to think about surrogacy and other reproductive innovations. Shapiro MH Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):647-80. PubMed ID: 11655181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Restricting surrogacy to married couples: a constitutional problem? The married-parent requirement in the Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act. Massie AM Hastings Constit Law Q; 1991; 18(3):487-540. PubMed ID: 11651494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative look at surrogacy. Feinerman JV Georgetown Law J; 1988 Jun; 76(5):1837-44. PubMed ID: 11649254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]