212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649258)
1. The ethics of the new reproductive technologies.
Schiedermayer DL
Christ Med Soc J; 1988; 19(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11649258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproductive technologies and the theology of the family.
Rae SB; Core JH
Ethics Med; 1994; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 11652747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A response to the Vatican document on IVF and related issues.
Overduin DCh
Lutheran Theol J; 1987 Aug; 21(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 11658932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Of milk-mothers and sacred bonds: Islam, patriarchy, and new reproductive technologies.
Zuhur S
Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1725-36. PubMed ID: 11653388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A biblical response to baby-making: surrogacy, artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
McColley D
J Biblic Ethics Med; 1991; 5(3):45-8. PubMed ID: 11659522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Creating brave new families with advanced reproductive technologies.
Braverman AM; English ME
NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1992; 3(2):353-63. PubMed ID: 1596443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical implications of in vitro fertilization.
McDowell JD
Christ Century; 1983 Oct; 100(30):936-8. PubMed ID: 11658680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproductive technologies: where are we headed?
McCormick RA
Loyola Law Rev; 1999; 45(2):269-85. PubMed ID: 16622957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Law for protection of embryos.
Germany
Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The stork market: the law of the new reproduction technologies.
Andrews LB
ABA J; 1984 Aug; 70(8):50-6. PubMed ID: 11658526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Jews and Evangelicals take differing stands.
Goldman AL
N Y Times Web; 1987 Mar; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11646549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The new Spanish law: a model for Europe?
Varela MJ; Stolcke V
Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 11652006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The challenges of new reproductive technologies for Jewish ethics.
Newman LE
Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1651-62. PubMed ID: 11653385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Technology and the womb.
Ostling RN
Time; 1987 Mar; 129(12):58-9. PubMed ID: 11653769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rules for making love and babies.
Woodward KL; Cohn B; Springen K
Newsweek; 1987 Mar; 109(12):42-3. PubMed ID: 11649854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Surrogacy: a Catholic perspective.
McCormick RA
Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1617-25. PubMed ID: 11653383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assisted conception and immunological infertility.
Cimino C; Catalano G; Cittadini E
Acta Eur Fertil; 1995; 26(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 8923912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tales from the baby factory.
Hopkins E
N Y Times Mag; 1992 Mar; ():40-41, 78, 80+. PubMed ID: 11646107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Who are the parents of biotechnological children?
Palmer LI
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A womb of one's own.
Stark E
Psychol Today; 1985 Jan; 19(1):11. PubMed ID: 11653635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
