These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649258)

  • 1. The ethics of the new reproductive technologies.
    Schiedermayer DL
    Christ Med Soc J; 1988; 19(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11649258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproductive technologies and the theology of the family.
    Rae SB; Core JH
    Ethics Med; 1994; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 11652747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A response to the Vatican document on IVF and related issues.
    Overduin DCh
    Lutheran Theol J; 1987 Aug; 21(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 11658932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Of milk-mothers and sacred bonds: Islam, patriarchy, and new reproductive technologies.
    Zuhur S
    Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1725-36. PubMed ID: 11653388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A biblical response to baby-making: surrogacy, artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
    McColley D
    J Biblic Ethics Med; 1991; 5(3):45-8. PubMed ID: 11659522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Creating brave new families with advanced reproductive technologies.
    Braverman AM; English ME
    NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1992; 3(2):353-63. PubMed ID: 1596443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical implications of in vitro fertilization.
    McDowell JD
    Christ Century; 1983 Oct; 100(30):936-8. PubMed ID: 11658680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproductive technologies: where are we headed?
    McCormick RA
    Loyola Law Rev; 1999; 45(2):269-85. PubMed ID: 16622957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Law for protection of embryos.
    Germany
    Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The stork market: the law of the new reproduction technologies.
    Andrews LB
    ABA J; 1984 Aug; 70(8):50-6. PubMed ID: 11658526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Jews and Evangelicals take differing stands.
    Goldman AL
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Mar; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11646549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The new Spanish law: a model for Europe?
    Varela MJ; Stolcke V
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 11652006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The challenges of new reproductive technologies for Jewish ethics.
    Newman LE
    Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1651-62. PubMed ID: 11653385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rules for making love and babies.
    Woodward KL; Cohn B; Springen K
    Newsweek; 1987 Mar; 109(12):42-3. PubMed ID: 11649854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technology and the womb.
    Ostling RN
    Time; 1987 Mar; 129(12):58-9. PubMed ID: 11653769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surrogacy: a Catholic perspective.
    McCormick RA
    Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1617-25. PubMed ID: 11653383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted conception and immunological infertility.
    Cimino C; Catalano G; Cittadini E
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1995; 26(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 8923912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tales from the baby factory.
    Hopkins E
    N Y Times Mag; 1992 Mar; ():40-41, 78, 80+. PubMed ID: 11646107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who are the parents of biotechnological children?
    Palmer LI
    Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A womb of one's own.
    Stark E
    Psychol Today; 1985 Jan; 19(1):11. PubMed ID: 11653635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.