188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649262)
1. Life and death decisions: who makes them and by what standards?
Pollock SG
Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):505-40. PubMed ID: 11649262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family.
Baron CH
Fam Law Q; 1983; 17(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 11658459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Living-will statutes: a minor oversight.
Hawkins LA
Va Law Rev; 1992 Oct; 78(7):1581-615. PubMed ID: 11659663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Liability for improper maintenance of life support: balancing patient and physician autonomy.
Addlestone SI
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1993 Oct; 46(5):1255-81. PubMed ID: 11653092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Specific intent, substituted judgment and best interests: a nationwide analysis of an individual's right to die.
Delaney JJ
Pace Law Rev; 1991; 11(3):565-641. PubMed ID: 11651454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state.
Morgan R; Harty-Golder B
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioethics and the family: the cautionary view from family law.
Schneider CE
Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):819-47. PubMed ID: 11656533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. From medicalization to legalization to politicization: O'Connor, Cruzan, and refusal of treatment in the 1990s.
Johnson SH
Conn Law Rev; 1989; 21(3):685-722. PubMed ID: 11650431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Louisiana's Natural Death Act and dilemmas in medical ethics.
Vitiello M
LA Law Rev; 1985; 46(2):259-309. PubMed ID: 11649843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right to die.
Sunstein CR
Yale Law J; 1997 Jan; 106(4):1123-63. PubMed ID: 11656791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Living will statutes: the first decade.
Gelfand G
Wis L Rev; 1987; 5(5):737-822. PubMed ID: 11650367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal trends in bioethics.
Fry-Revere S
J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 11642927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Balancing the right to die with competing interests: a socio-legal enigma.
Peterson GW
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985; 13(1):109-55. PubMed ID: 11658936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Model Aid-in-Dying Act.
Brandt CA
Iowa Law Rev; 1989 Oct; 75(1):125-215. PubMed ID: 11650935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legal trends in bioethics.
Fry-Revere S
J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 11642918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
Buchanan AE
UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A comprehensive look at Connecticut's living will statute.
Lieberson A
Conn Probate Law J; 1992; 7(1):49-113. PubMed ID: 11653117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests.
Watson DE
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
