These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649281)
1. Of ice and men: the big chill over women's reproductive rights. Raymond JG Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 11649281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In the beginning: the legal status of early embryos. Robertson JA Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):437-517. PubMed ID: 11659369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Allocation of decision-making rights to frozen embryos. Poole EK Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(1):67-102. PubMed ID: 11659329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Frozen embryos: moral, social, and legal implications. Wurmbrand MJ South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1079-100. PubMed ID: 11655851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sex as contract: abortion and expanded choice. Feaver PD; Kling R; Plofchan TK Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1992-1993 Winter; 4():211-20. PubMed ID: 11652652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act. Abbas J Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The ectogenetic human being: a problem child of our time. Dickens BM Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1979 Winter 1979-80; 18(1):241-67. PubMed ID: 11665167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Man-made man and the law. Tuchler DJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1978; 22(2):310-25. PubMed ID: 11664955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Civil law regulation of reproductive technologies: new laws for the new biology? Bercovitch J Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):385-406. PubMed ID: 11651095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The legal status of the embryo. Andrews LB Loyola Law Rev; 1986; 32(2):357-409. PubMed ID: 11658916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. American abortion law applied to new reproductive technology. Hemphill L Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(3):361-86. PubMed ID: 11656220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Pluck a fetus from its womb": a critique of current attitudes toward the embryo/fetus. Overall C Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1986 Jun; 24(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11651875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New reproductive technologies: the old quest for fatherhood. Stolcke V Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 11650380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The embryo as a legal entity -- woman as a fetal environment: the new German laws on reproductive engineering and embryo research. Waldschmidt A Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):209-22. PubMed ID: 11651216 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation. Lorio KV LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Davis v. Davis: the applicability of privacy and property rights to the disposition of frozen preembryos in intrafamilial disputes. Muller RJ Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1993; 24(3):763-804. PubMed ID: 11659794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Restrictions on women's right to abortion: informed consent, spousal consent, and record keeping provisions. Karg B Womens Rights Law Report; 1978; 5(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 11665035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The new reproductive technologies and the law: a Roman Catholic perspective. Wagner WJ J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():37-70. PubMed ID: 11645612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered? Lieber KB Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]