These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649397)
21. Liver transplantation in Massachusetts: public policymaking as morality play. Havighurst CC; King NM Indiana Law Rev; 1986; 19(4):955-87. PubMed ID: 11650768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Regulating heart and liver transplants in Massachusetts: an overview of the report of the Task Force on Organ Transplantation. Annas GJ Law Med Health Care; 1985 Feb; 13(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 11643868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Proprietary hospital good place for research--Humana official. Zenger GH Am Med News; 1985 Apr; 28(16):28. PubMed ID: 11649597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Confluence of ethical and economic issues in the development and adoption of high technology approaches in clinical care. Keller KH Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1992; 7(3-4):19-28. PubMed ID: 11651471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The stupidity of spare-part surgery. Gould D New Sci; 1984 Dec; 104(1434):30. PubMed ID: 11655654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Baby Fae and the media: how the law allows appropriate access. Christakis N; Panner M IRB; 1986; 8(2):5-7. PubMed ID: 11649750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Destructuring disability: rationing of health care and unfair discrimination against the sick. Orentlicher D Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1996; 31(1):49-87. PubMed ID: 11660333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. How we ration and allocate health care resources. Brodeur D Issues (St Louis Mo); 1996; 11(6):1-8. PubMed ID: 11660262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Premature infants: a legal approach to decision-making in neonatal intensive care. Gorski SL Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1985; 19(3-4):261-81. PubMed ID: 11649774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Classification of critically ill patients: a legal examination. Fama AJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1980 Oct; 24(3):514-33. PubMed ID: 11665253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it? Clark FI Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The legislative response to Infant Doe. Kuzma AL Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Hospice: the legal ramification of a place to die. Kuzma AL Indiana Law J; 1981; 56(4):673-702. PubMed ID: 11658767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board. Levine C; Caplan AL IRB; 1986; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Ethical decision making in managed care environments. Ross JW Bioethics Forum; 1994; 10(4):22-6. PubMed ID: 11652875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Rationing expensive lifesaving medical treatments. Mehlman MJ Wis L Rev; 1985; 1985(2):239-303. PubMed ID: 11658831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma? Shapiro RS; Barthel R Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Artificial heart: the debate goes on. Sci News; 1986 Feb; 129(8):122. PubMed ID: 11653690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Canada, the U.S., and the NICU: cultural differences and ethical consequences. Kluge EH J Clin Ethics; 2001; 12(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 11789074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]