These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
485 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649398)
1. Whistle blowing and countersuits: the President's Commission and fraudulent research. Shannon TA IRB; 1981; 3(7):6-7. PubMed ID: 11649398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Whistleblowing in biomedical research: report from a workshop. Mishkin B IRB; 1982 Feb; 4(2):8-9. PubMed ID: 11658314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Proposed model federal policy for protection of human subjects; response to the First Biennial Report of the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy Fed Regist; 1986 Jun; 51(106):20204-17. PubMed ID: 11658721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Call for research misconduct agency. White C BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1695. PubMed ID: 11645068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Science, journalism, and whistle-blowing. Koshland DE Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4852):585. PubMed ID: 11644303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB. Hilgartner S IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts. Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research. Wells F Account Res; 1997; 5(1-3):25-38. PubMed ID: 11654814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Finding a forum for bioethics in U.S. public policy. Hanna KE; Cook-Deegan RM; Nishimi RY Politics Life Sci; 1993 Aug; 12(2):205-19. PubMed ID: 11654723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. IRBs and the falsification of research data. Scher SR IRB; 1981; 3(7):8. PubMed ID: 11649399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Developing a federal policy on research misconduct. Francis S Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 11657864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. If only it were so: medical physics, U.S. human radiation experiments, and the Final Report of the President's Advisory Committee (ACHRE). Martensen R Med Humanit Rev; 1997; 11(2):21-36. PubMed ID: 11645853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science. LaFollette MC J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158. United States US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientists call for whistleblowers' charter. Goldbeck-Wood S BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7118):1252. PubMed ID: 11644976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Standards of accountability for consent in research. Rubenstein LS Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):197-206. PubMed ID: 11654515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case. Lang S Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The assault on David Baltimore. Kevles DJ New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Conflict of interest in human research ethics. Jones DJ NCBHR Commun; 1995; 6(2):5-10. PubMed ID: 11654611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]