309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649501)
1. Deception in social research I: kinds of deception and the wrongs they may involve.
Sieber JE
IRB; 1982 Nov; 4(9):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The ethics of open methods.
Homan R
Br J Sociol; 1992 Sep; 43(3):321-32. PubMed ID: 11660181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Informed consent in human experimentation: bridging the gap between ethical thought and current practice.
Delgado R; Leskovac H
UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):67-130. PubMed ID: 11659049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Research participation as a contract.
Lawson C
Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 11660017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement to participate in research: is that a promise?
Newton LH
IRB; 1984; 6(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research ethics in applied anthropology.
Marshall PA
IRB; 1992; 14(6):1-5. PubMed ID: 11651463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What should subjects be told about withdrawing from a protocol?
Levine RJ
IRB; 1981 Nov; 3(9):9-10. PubMed ID: 11649404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Autonomy, beneficence, and the experimental subject's consent: a response to Jay Katz.
Pellegrino ED
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11656324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A relational perspective on ethics-in-science decisionmaking for research with vulnerable populations.
Fisher CB
IRB; 1997; 19(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 11655184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The investigator's duty not to deceive.
Cupples B; Gochnauer M
IRB; 1985; 7(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tearoom trade: means and ends in social research.
Warwick DP
Stud Hastings Cent; 1973 Apr; 1(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 11661001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research with human subjects.
Ackerman TF
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(5):47-9. PubMed ID: 11653831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Privacy and research with human beings.
Kelman HC
J Soc Issues; 1977; 33(3):169-95. PubMed ID: 11661565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Protection of research subjects: do special rules apply in epidemiology?
Capron AM
Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(3-4):184-90. PubMed ID: 11642953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Debriefing and accountability in deceptive research.
Miller FG; Gluck JP; Wendler D
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2008 Sep; 18(3):235-51. PubMed ID: 18935922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Some perspectives on ethical/political issues in social science research.
Smith MB
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 1976; 2(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 11661365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there a right to fetal tissue transplantation?
Morgan GL
Univ Tasman Law Rev; 1991; 10(2):129-56. PubMed ID: 11659574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Information for consent in human experimentation.
Dickens BM
Univ Tor Law J; 1974; 24(4):381-410. PubMed ID: 11664387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The ethics of research in mental illness.
Ghaemi SN; Hundert EM
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 11653322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Deception methods in psychology: have they changed in 23 years?
Sieber JE; Iannuzzo R; Rodriguez B
Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(1):67-85. PubMed ID: 11654171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
