342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649505)
1. Science's faulty fraud detectors.
Broad WJ; Wade N
Psychol Today; 1982 Nov; 16(11):51-54, 57. PubMed ID: 11649505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Procedures for Responding to Charges of Unethical Research Practices, Revised March 1985 Report of the Faculty Ad Hoc Committee to Investigate Research Fraud, 30 September 1986.
University of California, San Diego. School of Medicine
Minerva; 1987; 25(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 11650156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cheating in science and publishing.
Altman LK
CBE Views; 1981; 4(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 11649550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. When good scientists turn bad.
Roman MB
Discover; 1988 Apr; 9(4):50-55, 57-58. PubMed ID: 11653808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
Hilgartner S
IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Character and the ethical conduct of research.
Pellegrino ED
Account Res; 1992; 2(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11651456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
Pennock RT
Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case.
Kochan CA; Budd JM
J Am Soc Inf Sci; 1992 Aug; 43(7):488-93. PubMed ID: 11653988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Allocating credit and blame in science.
Chubin DE
Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):53-63. PubMed ID: 11650139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fraud in science: how much, how serious?
Woolf P
Hastings Cent Rep; 1981 Oct; 11(5):9-14. PubMed ID: 7309502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. British cast spotlight on misconduct in scientific research.
Altman LK
N Y Times Web; 1998 Jun; ():F3. PubMed ID: 11647563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Deceit in science: does it really matter?
Birch AJ
Interdiscip Sci Rev; 1990 Dec; 15(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 11651223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Global trend: more science, more fraud.
Altman L; Broad WJ
N Y Times Web; 2005 Dec; ():F1, F6. PubMed ID: 16450465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What do we know about fraud and other forms of intellectual dishonesty in science? Part 2: why does fraud happen and what are its effects?
Garfield E
Curr Contents Clin Med; 1987 Apr; 15(15):3-10. PubMed ID: 11649943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What science can learn from science fraud.
Wade N
New Sci; 1983 Jul; 99(1368):273-5. PubMed ID: 11655555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New censors in the academy: two approaches to curb their influences.
Davis RD
Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 11650140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The exposure of a scientific fraud.
Swan N
New Sci; 1988 Dec; 120(1641):30-1. PubMed ID: 11655909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
