156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649548)
1. Retailing human organs under the Uniform Commercial Code.
Chapman DE
John Marshall Law Rev; 1983; 16(2):393-417. PubMed ID: 11649548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tax consequences of selling human organs.
Borna S; Foss HB
Akron Bus Econ Rev; 1986; 17(3):55-60. PubMed ID: 11649822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The economics and ethics of alternative cadaveric organ procurement policies.
Blair RD; Kaserman DL
Yale J Regul; 1991; 8(2):403-52. PubMed ID: 11652066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The meaning of "The economics and ethics of alternative cadaveric organ procurement policies.
Guttmann RD
Yale J Regul; 1991; 8(2):453-62. PubMed ID: 11652067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Antitrust problems and solutions to meet the demand for transplantable organs.
Hawley CK
Univ Ill Law Rev; 1991; 1991(4):1101-33. PubMed ID: 11652235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A futures market in cadaveric organs: would it work?
Cohen LR
Transplant Proc; 1993 Feb; 25(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 11655155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Tissue transplants: the dilemma of the body's growing value.
Thorne ED
Public Interest; 1990; No. 98():37-48. PubMed ID: 11650342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The sale of human organs: implicating a privacy right.
Johnson KL
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1987; 21(3):741-62. PubMed ID: 11649985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Organ transplantation crisis: should the deficit be eliminated through inter vivos sales?
Boyce RM
Akron Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):283-302. PubMed ID: 11650016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Yes, let's pay for organs.
Krauthammer C
Time; 1999 May; 153(19):100. PubMed ID: 11645351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "She's got Bette Davis eyes": assessing the nonconsensual removal of cadaver organs under the takings and due process clauses.
Jaffe ES
Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Mar; 90(2):528-74. PubMed ID: 11659304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The sale of human body parts.
Mich Law Rev; 1974 May; 72(6):1182-264. PubMed ID: 11664350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Litigation, legislation, and limelight: obstacles to commercial surrogate mother arrangements.
Tiller SL
Iowa Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 72(2):415-44. PubMed ID: 11658963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Alternatives to current organ donation statutes.
Musial EM
Dial Transplant; 1982 Aug; 11(8):658. PubMed ID: 11653695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Increasing the supply of transplant organs: the virtues of a futures market.
Cohen LR
George Washington Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 58(1):1-51. PubMed ID: 11656012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Issues and controversies surrounding organ donation and transplantation: the need for laws that ensure equity and optimal utility of a scarce resource.
Khauli RB
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1225-36. PubMed ID: 11657036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The law and economics of organ procurement.
Hylton KN
Law Policy; 1990 Jul; 12(3):197-224. PubMed ID: 11652113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The morality of a free market for transplant organs.
Nelson MT
Public Aff Q; 1991 Jan; 5(1):63-79. PubMed ID: 11652012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. National Organ Transplant Act: Public Law 98-507.
United States
US Statut Large; 1984 Oct; 98():2339-48. PubMed ID: 11660818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Financial incentives in organ donation: current issues.
Peters TG
Dial Transplant; 1992 May; 21(5):270, 273, 290. PubMed ID: 11654010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
