232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649552)
1. In re living will.
Havens SL
Nova Law J; 1981; 5(3):445-70. PubMed ID: 11649552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Euthanasia: the right to be 'let' alone.
Hill RE
South Univ Law Rev; 1980; 7(1):101-12. PubMed ID: 11649557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
Hyland WF; Baime DS
Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. AIDS and living wills.
Kortlandt CE
AIDS Public Policy J; 1990; 5(4):157-66. PubMed ID: 11650975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Death and dying in Tennessee.
McKenney EJ
Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1977; 7(4):503-54. PubMed ID: 11663172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes.
Dyke MC
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The right of the dying to refuse life prolonging medical procedures: the evolving importance of state constitutions.
Marks TC; Morgan RC
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1992; 18(3):467-98. PubMed ID: 11654441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pregnancy clauses in living will statutes.
MacAvoy-Snitzer J
Columbia Law Rev; 1987 Oct; 87(6):1280-300. PubMed ID: 11652510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Death with dignity laws: a plea for uniform legislation.
Freamon BK
Seton Hall Legis J; 1982; 5(2):105-47. PubMed ID: 11651748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die.
Glick HR
West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Living will statutes: a proposal for Kentucky.
Landers MC
KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(2):395-418. PubMed ID: 11649956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The right to die.
Vaughan NL
Calif West Law Rev; 1974; 10(3):613-27. PubMed ID: 11661103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Give me liberty and give me death: the right to die and the California Natural Death Act.
Beraldo C
Santa Clara Law Rev; 1980; 20(4):971-91. PubMed ID: 11649458
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Law at the edge of life: issues of death and dying.
Janzen PS
Hamline Law Rev; 1984 Jun; 7(2):431-62. PubMed ID: 11649814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients.
Gottlich V
Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Family surrogate laws: a necessary supplement to living wills and durable powers of attorney.
Hamann AA
Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(1):103-77. PubMed ID: 11654083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Death and life decisions: who is in control?
Kenney SC
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 23(3):791-828. PubMed ID: 11652584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology.
Richardson E
Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Cruzan legacy: legislative and judicial responses and insights for the future.
Gieszl HC; Velasco PA
Ariz State Law J; 1992; 24(2):719-801. PubMed ID: 11654081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
