These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649557)
41. Constitutional law--Florida's right to die--a question of litigation or legislation? O'Shea R Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1980; 8(1):111-28. PubMed ID: 11661918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Terminal care document. Vermont Vt Statut Annot Vt; 1981; Title 18 Chapter 111 Sections 5251 to 5262():. PubMed ID: 12041405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The 'crucible of the bedside'. Med World News; 1985 May; 26(9):112-4. PubMed ID: 11645551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Living wills: the need for uniform state laws. Warnock HC Probate Prop; 1991; 5(3):52-6. PubMed ID: 11652620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications. Parry JW Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Proposed state euthanasia statutes: a philosophical and legal analysis. Kapner E Hofstra Law Rev; 1975; 3(3):115-40. PubMed ID: 11661928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Natural death acts and right to die legislation. Hallagan JB Med Trial Tech Q; 1986; 32(3):301-20. PubMed ID: 11649842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The right-to-die: state policymaking and the elderly. Glick HR J Aging Stud; 1991; 5(3):283-307. PubMed ID: 11652602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. A critical analysis of the Arkansas death with dignity act. Simpson HH; Armbrust CB Univ Ark Little Rock Law J; 1978; 1(2):473-87. PubMed ID: 11661620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Living wills in the United States and Canada: a comparative analysis. Steinle SJ Case West Reserve J Int Law; 1992; 24(2):435-73. PubMed ID: 11652678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The Cruzan legacy: legislative and judicial responses and insights for the future. Gieszl HC; Velasco PA Ariz State Law J; 1992; 24(2):719-801. PubMed ID: 11654081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Durable power of attorney for health care: a better choice. Garraty CM Conn Probate Law J; 1992; 7(1):115-41. PubMed ID: 11653116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health: a clear and convincing call for comprehensive legislation to protect incompetent patients' rights. Suhr JN Am Univ Law Rev; 1991; 40(4):1477-519. PubMed ID: 11651350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The 'right to die': legislative and judicial developments. Horan DJ Linacre Q; 1979 Feb; 46(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 11661637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Decisions for the dying: an empirical study of physicians' responses to advance directives. Zinberg JM Vt Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):445-91. PubMed ID: 11653869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. What right to die? Rosen J New Repub; 1996 Jun; 214(26):28-31. PubMed ID: 11656670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Hospice: the legal ramification of a place to die. Kuzma AL Indiana Law J; 1981; 56(4):673-702. PubMed ID: 11658767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases. Riga PJ Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]