171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649558)
1. Constitutional law--right to refuse medical treatment--decisions to terminate life-prolonging treatment for incompetent patients--In re Spring, No. 2030 (Mass. order of Jan. 14, 1980).
Lubinsky MS
West New Engl Law Rev; 1980; 2(4):759-74. PubMed ID: 11649558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In the matter of Mary Hier.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 11644048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Refusing life-sustaining treatment for incompetent patients: mere existence or a quality life?
Cerminara KL
Med Trial Tech Q; 1988; 35(2):121-45. PubMed ID: 11652537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent.
Brant J
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity.
Agrawal A
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Right to die: a survey of legislative and judicial responses to life-support technology.
Richardson E
Glendale Law Rev; 1981-1982; 5(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 11652441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar.
Williams SE
Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Surrogate decision making for mentally incapacitated adults.
Nelson LJ; Golenski JD
Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Feb-Mar-Apr; 1(2 3 & 4):1-28. PubMed ID: 11650108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate.
Tecklenburg N
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Family law--guardians of incompetent persons can refuse life-prolonging treatment for their wards.
Gilman GS
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1978; 12(4):1039-57. PubMed ID: 11662777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In the matter of George Clark.
Nimz M
Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 11644464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law.
Miller DH
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1988; 65(2-3):181-212. PubMed ID: 11659201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Beth Israel Medical Center.
Thompson L
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 11644333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis.
Murphy JG
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Right to die takes a twist.
Med World News; 1985 Mar; 26(5):7. PubMed ID: 11645546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In the Matter of Elizabeth Visbeck: an alleged incompetent.
Nimz MM
Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 11644463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
