490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649586)
1. Medical decision-making: patient participation.
Wolfgarten A; Khan A
Med Leg J; 1984; 52(Pt. 3):180-90. PubMed ID: 11649586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Consent to medical procedures: paternalism, self-determination or therapeutic alliance?
Teff H
Law Q Rev; 1985 Jul; 101():432-53. PubMed ID: 11658726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Informed consent in the prescription drug context: the special case.
Tietz GF
Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):367-417. PubMed ID: 11652502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent.
Shaw A; Shaw IA
Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 11651357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The meaning of informed consent.
Whitfield A
Med Leg J; 1986; 54(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 11653740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed consent--a fairy tale? Law's vision.
Katz J
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1977; 39(2):137-74. PubMed ID: 11661530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient participation in medical decision-making: are the courts the answer?
Bromberger B
Univ N S W Law J; 1983; 6(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11649729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Demanded medical care.
Menikoff J
Ariz State Law J; 1998; 30(4):1091-126. PubMed ID: 11660771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent for the man on the Clapham omnibus: an English cure for "the American disease".
Miller FH
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):169-90. PubMed ID: 11649911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent: the three tests and a modest proposal for the reality of the patient as an individual.
Trichter JG; Lewis PW
South Tex Law J; 1981; 21(2):155-70. PubMed ID: 11658706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana.
Boland GL
LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. From informed consent to patient choice: a new protected interest.
Shultz MM
Yale Law J; 1985 Dec; 95(2):219-99. PubMed ID: 11658859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patients, agents, and informed consent.
Haber JG
J Law Health; 1985-1986; 1():43-59.. PubMed ID: 11658933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Consent to medical treatment in Canada.
Picard EI
Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent: the law's uneasy compromise with ethical theory.
Weisbard AJ
Neb Law Rev; 1986; 65(4):749-67. PubMed ID: 11658870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of the law relating to the physician's duty to obtain the patient's "informed consent" to medical treatment in England and California.
Churchward AB
Conn J Int Law; 1990; 5(2):483-563. PubMed ID: 11659375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical models and legal categories: an English perspective.
Teff H
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():211-32. PubMed ID: 10126939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent.
Horan DJ; Halligan P
Linacre Q; 1982 Nov; 49(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 11649603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Vindicating the patient's rights: a comparative perspective.
Giesen D
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():273-309. PubMed ID: 10126941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis.
Monks SS
Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
