490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649586)
21. The therapeutic justification for withholding medical information: what you don't know can't hurt you, or can it?
Patterson EG
Neb Law Rev; 1985; 64(4):721-71. PubMed ID: 11649808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Case of no consent: the DNR order as a medical decision.
Beatty CD
St Louis Univ Law J; 1987 Sep; 31(3):699-727. PubMed ID: 11658986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Medical risks, patients' rights, and the inadequacies of the negligence action.
Martin R
Hong Kong Law J; 1985 May; 15(2):150-66. PubMed ID: 11658882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system.
Deardorff SE
Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The emergence and rise of medical law and ethics.
Grubb A
Mod Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 50(2):241-67. PubMed ID: 11658918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent.
Halligan PD
LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The surgeon's duty to warn of risks: transatlantic approach rejected by Court of Appeal.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1984 Mar; 1(8376):578-9. PubMed ID: 11644281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The values history: a new standard of care.
Rich BA
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1109-81. PubMed ID: 11652633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. An inventory: the emerging rights of the physically ill family member.
Snowden RF
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1973; 6():133-59. PubMed ID: 11664269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Informed consent: a German lesson.
Shaw J
Int Comp Law Q; 1986 Oct; 35(4):864-90. PubMed ID: 11659183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Hopp v. Lepp.
Canada. Supreme Court
Dom Law Rep; 1980 May; 112():67-83. PubMed ID: 12041085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Informed consent: alternatives for Illinois.
Holmstrom JT
Univ Ill Law Forum; 1973; 1973(4):739-56. PubMed ID: 11664278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Psychiatric care and the law of substitute decision-making.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1987; 11(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 11658868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Fraudulent concealment and the duty to disclose medical mistakes.
Robertson G
Alta Law Rev; 1987; 25(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11657367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Beyond misguided paternalism: resuscitating the right to refuse medical treatment.
Malloy SE
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1998; 33():1035-91. PubMed ID: 11660805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model.
Dunphy SM; Cross JH
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Children's competence to provide informed consent for mental health treatment.
Redding RE
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1993; 50(2):695-753. PubMed ID: 11656328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Hills v. Potter.
Great Britain. England. Queen's Bench Division
All Engl Law Rep; 1983 May; [1983] 3():716-29. PubMed ID: 11648156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Rogers v. Whitaker and informed consent in Australia: a fair dinkum duty of disclosure.
Chalmers D; Schwartz R
Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(2):139-59. PubMed ID: 11660490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Children's rights: removing the parental consent barrier to medical treatment of minors.
Wilkins LP
Ariz State Law J; 1975; 1975(1):31-92. PubMed ID: 11664511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
