These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The Council on Psychiatry and Law. Roth LH Am J Psychiatry; 1986 Mar; 143(3):412-3. PubMed ID: 11643912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of empathy in forensic examinations. Shuman DW Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(3 and 4):289-302. PubMed ID: 11659813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. United States Supreme Court and psychiatry: a critical look. Malmquist CP J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(1-2):137-64. PubMed ID: 11658821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. "Tarasoff" defendants: social justice or ethical decay? Leong GB; Eth S; Silva JA J Forensic Sci; 1994 Jan; 39(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 11644513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The evolution of Tarasoff: recent developments in the psychiatrist's duties to warn potential victims, protect the public, and predict dangerousness. Greenberg LT J Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):315-48. PubMed ID: 11658762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Power imbalances in therapeutic and forensic relationships. Perlin ML Behav Sci Law; 1991; 9(2):111-28. PubMed ID: 11645719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A psychiatrist's duty of confidentiality. Brahams D Lancet; 1988 Dec 24-31; 2(8626-8627):1503-4. PubMed ID: 11653823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. W v. Egdell. Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Chancery Division All Engl Law Rep; 1988 Dec; [1989] 1():1089-110. PubMed ID: 11648575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Confidentiality and the "dangerous" patient: implications of Tarasoff for psychiatrists and lawyers. Merton V Emory Law J; 1982; 31(2):263-343. PubMed ID: 11653483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tarasoff down under: the psychiatrist's duty to warn in Australia. Mendelson D; Mendelson G J Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1-2):33-61. PubMed ID: 11659859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Case underlines psychiatric issue: to keep confidences or report threats. Marcus FF N Y Times Web; 1986 May; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11646505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The patient or his victim: the therapist's dilemma. Fleming JG; Maximov B Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):1025-68. PubMed ID: 11663459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. On the ethics of dangerousness assessments. Litwack TR Law Hum Behav; 1993 Aug; 17(4):479-82. PubMed ID: 11659732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 6 Jul 1973. California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1 Wests Calif Report; 1973; 108():878-901. PubMed ID: 11646032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical issues in the practice of forensic psychiatry. Waithe ME; Rappeport JR; Weinstein HC; Baumrin BH J Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(1):7-43. PubMed ID: 11658376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. More positive supreme court views on psychiatry. Kennelly DJ Am J Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 142(3):387-8. PubMed ID: 3970284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]