These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Hospital failed on human research policy. Science; 1998 Nov; 282(5391):1035. PubMed ID: 11645114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research. Jellinek MS; Levine RJ IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Guidelines for confidentiality in research on AIDS. Bayer R; Levine C; Murray TH IRB; 1984; 6(6):1-7. PubMed ID: 11649192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Multicenter trials and subject eligibility: should local IRBs play a role? Freedman B IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. DHHS internal policies for reviewing research involving children. Reatig N IRB; 1981 Jan; 3(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11661894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters. van Eys J; Levine RJ IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Two rules on expedited IRB reviews are final. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):3. PubMed ID: 11657557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Is this a job for the IRB? The case of the ELISA assay. Holder AR IRB; 1985; 7(6):7-8. PubMed ID: 11649689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Human experimentation: the review process in practice. Cowan DH Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. New confidentiality duties for institutional review boards. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 11660761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Bill of rights for research subjects. Prentice ED; Reitemeier PJ; Antonson DL; Kelso TK; Jameton A IRB; 1993; 15(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Changing federal regulation of IRBs, Part III: social research and the proposed DHEW regulations. Gray BH IRB; 1980 Jan; 2(1):1-5+. PubMed ID: 11661793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Why HHS should reconsider its proposed exemption for social policy experiments. Abram MB; IRB; 1982 May; 4(5):10-2. PubMed ID: 11649408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies. Prentice ED; Gordon B IRB; 1997; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]