266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649637)
1. Substituted judgment and the terminally-ill incompetent.
Santurri EN; Werpehowski W
Thought; 1982 Dec; 57(227):484-501. PubMed ID: 11649637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
Colabrese CA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
Buchanan AE
UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model.
Dunphy SM; Cross JH
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients.
Dresser R
Rutgers Law Rev; 1994; 46(2):609-719. PubMed ID: 11660406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Matter of Storar; Eichner v. Dillon.
New York. Court of Appeals
North East Rep Second Ser; 1981 Mar; 420():64-80. PubMed ID: 12041255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Eichner/Storar decision: a year's perspective.
Dunn LJ
Law Med Health Care; 1982 Jun; 10(3):117-119, 141. PubMed ID: 11643893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar.
Williams SE
Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A patient's last rights: termination of medical care--an analysis of New York's In re Storar.
Day K
Albany Law Rev; 1982; 46(4):1380-413. PubMed ID: 11658533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The search for objectivity in applying the substituted judgment rule in medical care cases.
King JC
Boston Bar J; 1993; 37(17):10-12, 14. PubMed ID: 11652649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Constitutional law--right of privacy--qualified right to refuse medical treatment may be asserted for incompetent under doctrine of substituted judgment.
Davis PK
Emory Law J; 1978; 27(2):425-60. PubMed ID: 11665011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I.
Solnick PB
Med Law; 1984 Sep; 3(4):303-32. PubMed ID: 11651779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Advance directives for health care: a proposal for priests and religious.
Caspar R
Rev Relig; 1988; 47(2):202-16. PubMed ID: 11652515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections.
Kadish SH
Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate.
Tecklenburg N
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical issues of life and death: a review article.
Rowntree S
Thought; 1982 Dec; 57(227):449-64. PubMed ID: 11649634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The preservation of life and self-determination.
McCormick RA; Veatch RM
Theol Stud; 1980 Jun; 41(2):390-6. PubMed ID: 11661994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-step fantastic: the continuing case of Brother Fox.
Ramsey P
Theol Stud; 1981 Mar; 42(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 11658893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
