135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649666)
1. Termination of treatment in the persistent vegetative state.
Cranford RE
Semin Neurol; 1984 Mar; 4(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 11649666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Neurologists and the hospital ethics committee.
Cranford RE; Jackson DL
Semin Neurol; 1984 Mar; 4(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 11649663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The case for letting vegetative patients die.
Jennett B
Ethics Med; 1993; 9(3):40-4. PubMed ID: 11652744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical ethics in life and death.
Thompson R
Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983).
Crook RR
Cumberland Law Rev; 1984-1985; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts.
Rhoden NK
South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rationing life.
Rothman DJ
New York Rev Books; 1992 Mar; 39(5):32-7. PubMed ID: 11659609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Physician willingness to withhold tube feeding after Cruzan: an empirical study.
Peters PG; Ely JW; Zweig SC; Elder NC; Schneider FD
Miss Law Rev; 1992; 57():831-48. PubMed ID: 11654076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The other right-to-life debate: when does Fourteenth Amendment "life" end?
Linder DO
Ariz Law Rev; 1995; 37(4):1183-207. PubMed ID: 11657292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Setting floating limits: functional status care categories as national policy.
Thomasma DC
Bus Prof Ethics J; 1990; 9(3 and 4):133-46. PubMed ID: 11651033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Decisions to treat critically ill patients: a comparison of social versus medical considerations.
Crane D
Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1975; 53(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11663256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.
Feenan D
J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Feeding the dying elderly.
Callahan D
Generations; 1985; 10(2):15-7. PubMed ID: 11658806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):331-42. PubMed ID: 11651817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system.
Deardorff SE
Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. VHA ethics rounds:
Bernat JL
NCCE News; 1995; 3(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 11657132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Life termination" in the Netherlands.
Hellema H
BMJ; 1991 Apr; 302(6783):984-5. PubMed ID: 11642883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Two precipices, one chasm: the economics of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.
Lund N
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):903-46. PubMed ID: 11657287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
New Jersey
N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
