242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649689)
1. Is this a job for the IRB? The case of the ELISA assay.
Holder AR
IRB; 1985; 7(6):7-8. PubMed ID: 11649689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Guidelines for confidentiality in research on AIDS.
Bayer R; Levine C; Murray TH
IRB; 1984; 6(6):1-7. PubMed ID: 11649192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The changing clinical trials scene: the role of the IRB.
Mitchell SC; Steingrub J
IRB; 1988; 10(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11650078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. IRB jurisdiction and limits on IRB actions.
Hershey N; Cann CI; Rothman KJ
IRB; 1985; 7(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters.
van Eys J; Levine RJ
IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective.
Bagley G
Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Do research subjects have the right not to know their HIV antibody test results?
Novick A; Dubler NN; Landesman SH
IRB; 1986; 8(5):6-9. PubMed ID: 11653767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A look at the bioresearch monitoring program: the agency perspective.
Brisson EL
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1983 Apr; 38(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 11649578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. AIDS: at the limits of the law.
Wertheimer E
Villanova Law Rev; 1989 Sep; 34(5):755-69. PubMed ID: 11651161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Guidelines issued to thwart confidence crisis among AIDS research subjects.
Med World News; 1984 Dec; 25(23):34. PubMed ID: 11645537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The FDA's enforcement of IRBs and patient informed consent.
Kelsey FO
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Jan; 44(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11651627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Can (or should) the IRB assume the FDA's functions at early stages of the IND process?
Levine RJ
IRB; 1981 Dec; 3(10):4-5. PubMed ID: 11649414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners.
Herch F; Flower R
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Food and Drug Administration's role in the protection of human subjects.
Nightingale SL
IRB; 1983; 5(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 11649511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Two rules on expedited IRB reviews are final.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):3. PubMed ID: 11657557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. FDA's new rule on treatment use and sale of investigational new drugs.
Levine RJ
IRB; 1987; 9(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The burgeoning law of medical experimentation involving human subjects.
Bryant LE
John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1974; 8(1):19-51. PubMed ID: 11663465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reviewing subject recruitment: new rules from Rockville.
McMahon FG
IRB; 1988; 10(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 11651911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The FDA's final regulations: IRBs and medical devices.
Holder AR
IRB; 1980; 2(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11661803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulation of clinical research: who's protecting who from what?
Petricciani JC
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1979 Apr; 34(4):205-7. PubMed ID: 11661718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
