BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649692)

  • 1. Privacy in personal medical information: a diagnosis.
    Newman S
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1981; 33(3):394-424. PubMed ID: 11649692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beyond Jaffee v. Redmond: should the federal courts recognize a right to physician-patient confidentiality?
    Silver SA
    Ohio State Law J; 1998; 58(5):1809-66. PubMed ID: 16211748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protecting the privacy of the absent patient: Rudnick v. Superior Court.
    Tarr RW
    Hastings Law J; 1975 Sep; 27(1):99-135. PubMed ID: 11664510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computerized medical records and the right to privacy: the emerging federal response.
    Boyer BB
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1975; 25(1):37-118. PubMed ID: 11664544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hippocrates to HIPAA: a foundation for a federal physician-patient privilege.
    Ruebner R; Reis LA
    Temple Law Rev; 2004; 77(3):505-75. PubMed ID: 17066561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Privacy: drug use reporting requirements unconstitutional.
    Brown DC
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1977; 2(1):127-36. PubMed ID: 11661516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic information and third party access to information: New Jersey's pioneering legislation as a model for federal privacy protection of genetic information.
    Stepanuk NA
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1998; 47(3):1105-44. PubMed ID: 11660610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexuality, privacy and the new biology.
    Smith GP; Iraola R
    Marquette Law Rev; 1984; 67(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 11658703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A drug addict's right to anonymity.
    DeSabato AA
    Villanova Law Rev; 1975 Mar; 20(4):800-36. PubMed ID: 11664514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Public health protection and the privacy of medical records.
    Parmet W
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1981; 16(1):265-304. PubMed ID: 11650561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Legal issues and measures for protection of individual privacy in computerized health information systems.
    Beggs-Baker Se
    Lex Sci; 1974; 10(3):90-104. PubMed ID: 11664782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Congressman Jack Kemp introduces the proposed Medical Records Privacy Act of 1974.
    Kemp J
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1974 Oct; 120(158):H10679-83. PubMed ID: 11661140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Policy-makers chip away at confidentiality protections.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Aug; 14(15 Bonus Report):1-4. PubMed ID: 11660739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions.
    Wolff MH; Hawn RH
    Calif West Law Rev; 1982; 19(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward a more perfect union: a federal cause of action for physician aid-in-dying.
    Robichaud TD
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1994; 27(2):521-64. PubMed ID: 11656405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Keeping secrets.
    Scarf M
    N Y Times Mag; 1996 Jun; ():38-40. PubMed ID: 11648023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
    Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Privacy rights in medical records.
    Cleaver CM
    Fordham Urban Law J; 1984-1985; 13(1):165-204. PubMed ID: 11650743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Online without a net: physician-patient communication by electronic mail.
    Spielberg AR
    Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(2-3):267-95. PubMed ID: 10476331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.