396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649747)
1. Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients.
Cantor NL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1985; 37(3):543-77. PubMed ID: 11649747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity.
Agrawal A
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law.
Jarrett C
Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In the matter of Claire Conroy.
Connery JR
Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 11651840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Foregoing life-sustaining treatment: what are the legal limits in an aging society?
Rothenberg KH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1989; 33(3):575-602. PubMed ID: 11650402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. 'Right-to-die' theory upheld in New Jersey.
Rust M
Am Med News; 1985 Feb; 28(5):1, 23. PubMed ID: 11653617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Louisiana's Natural Death Act and dilemmas in medical ethics.
Vitiello M
LA Law Rev; 1985; 46(2):259-309. PubMed ID: 11649843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In the Matter of Elizabeth Visbeck: an alleged incompetent.
Nimz MM
Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 11644463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Caring or starving? The case of Claire Conroy.
McCormick RA
America (NY); 1985 Apr; 152(13):269-73. PubMed ID: 11658669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative.
Rubin BL
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die.
Zaremba JF
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Quinlan: one step further.
Ek GK
Houst Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 24(2):383-98. PubMed ID: 11649893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
Colabrese CA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Balancing the right to die with competing interests: a socio-legal enigma.
Peterson GW
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985; 13(1):109-55. PubMed ID: 11658936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience.
Weinberg JK
Hastings Law J; 1988 Nov; 40(1):119-67. PubMed ID: 11659106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients.
Dresser R
Rutgers Law Rev; 1994; 46(2):609-719. PubMed ID: 11660406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing.
Koop CE; Grant ER
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):585-634. PubMed ID: 11650885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides?
Corbett KA; Raciti RM
New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
