BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649757)

  • 1. Do human cells have rights?
    Warnock M
    Bioethics; 1987 Jan; 1(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11649757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Embryo research.
    Robertson JA
    Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1986; 24(1):15-37. PubMed ID: 11658730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tempest in the laboratory: medical research on spare embryos from in vitro fertilization.
    Gregoratos B
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):977-1006. PubMed ID: 11655859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Warnock versus Powell (and Harradine): when does potentiality count?
    Lockwood M
    Bioethics; 1988 Jul; 2(3):187-213. PubMed ID: 11659014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Waller, Warnock and Roe v. Wade: variations on the status of the orphan embryo--comment.
    Van de Weghe B
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():231-54. PubMed ID: 11645586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The inhuman use of human beings: a statement on embryo research.
    Ramsey Colloquium
    First Things; 1995 Jan; 49():17-21. PubMed ID: 11659886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The embryo debate.
    Habgood S; Cameron NM
    Ethics Med; 1990; 6(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11659245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethics and policy in embryonic stem cell research.
    Robertson JA
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1999 Jun; 9(2):109-36. PubMed ID: 11660628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developments in biotechnology: ethical perspectives.
    O'Rourke K
    Linacre Q; 1989 Nov; 56(4):11-7. PubMed ID: 11659198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experiments on embryos: do they have rights?
    Smith T
    J R Soc Med; 1985 Jun; 78(6):503-4. PubMed ID: 11643752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ten years on from the Warnock Report: is the human embryo a person?
    Puca A
    Linacre Q; 1995 May; 62(2):75-87. PubMed ID: 11654680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ten years after the Warnock Report: is the human neo-conceptus a person?
    Sutton A
    Linacre Q; 1995 May; 62(2):63-74. PubMed ID: 11654679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Arguing from potential.
    Buckle S
    Bioethics; 1988 Jul; 2(3):226-53. PubMed ID: 11659016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changing minds about embryo research.
    Mulkay M
    Public Underst Sci; 1994; 3():195-213. PubMed ID: 11659865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Moral thinking and government policy: the Warnock Committee on Human Embryology.
    Warnock M
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(3):504-22. PubMed ID: 3852077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guidelines concerning research on early human embryos.
    German Medical Association. Federal Medical Board. Scientific Advisory Board
    World Med J; 1986; 33(2-3):29-33. PubMed ID: 11659001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ethics of funding embryonic stem cell research: a Catholic viewpoint.
    Doerflinger RM
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1999 Jun; 9(2):137-50. PubMed ID: 11657324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The right to life in law: the embryo and fetus, the body and soul, the family and society.
    Hicks SC
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1991; 19(3):805-50. PubMed ID: 11656190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion and the value of life: a discussion of Life's Dominion.
    Kamm FM
    Columbia Law Rev; 1995 Jan; 95(1):160-221. PubMed ID: 11660105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using people.
    Coughlan MJ; Anscombe G
    Bioethics; 1990 Jan; 4(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 11650881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.