These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11649764)

  • 1. Considerations of social science in a reconsideration of Parham v. J.R. and the commitment of children to public mental institutions.
    Schmidt WC
    J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(3-4):339-59. PubMed ID: 11649764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Post-Parham remedies: the involuntary commitment of minors in Virginia after Parham v. J.R.
    Spaulding WJ
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):695-741. PubMed ID: 11665159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can parents "volunteer" their children into mental institutions: an analysis of Kremens v. Bartley and Parham v. J.L. and J.R.
    Ment Retard Law; 1978 Jan; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 11686183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Who are you to say what my best interest is?" Minors' due process rights when admitted by parents for inpatient mental health treatment.
    Schmidt K
    Wash Law Rev; 1996 Oct; 71(4):1187-217. PubMed ID: 11660505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Due process limitations on parental rights to commit children to mental institutions.
    Holladay JN
    Univ Colo Law Rev; 1977; 48(2):235-66. PubMed ID: 11664712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A chance to be heard: an application of Bellotti v. Baird to the civil commitment of minors.
    Butler KA
    Hastings Law J; 1981 May; 32(5):1285-318. PubMed ID: 11658348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Constitutional law--due process--civil commitment of children by parents--Parham v. J.R.
    Citarella KC
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(4):1001-25. PubMed ID: 11658638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power, uncertainty, and choice: the voluntary commitment of children--Parham v. J.L.
    Simet DP
    Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1982 May; 20(1):141-61. PubMed ID: 11658705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parham v. J.R. 20 Jun 1979.
    U.S. District Court, M.D. Georgia
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1979; 442():584-639. PubMed ID: 12038354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Making kids take their medicine: the privacy and due process rights of de facto competent minors.
    Costello JC
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 31(3):907-27. PubMed ID: 11660787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Due process in the "voluntary" civil commitment of juvenile wards.
    Glaessner PO
    J Leg Med; 1981 Jun; 2(2):169-92. PubMed ID: 6972431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Four alternatives to the guidelines for the psychiatric hospitalization of minors: clinical and legal considerations.
    Stone AA; Bonnie R;
    Am J Psychiatry; 1982 Jul; 139(7):974-5. PubMed ID: 11643761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guidelines for the psychiatric hospitalization of minors.
    American Psychiatric Association
    Am J Psychiatry; 1982 Jul; 139(7):971-4. PubMed ID: 11643760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parental power in the voluntary commitment of children to mental institutions.
    Riggert BA
    Washburn Law J; 1978; 17(3):595-614. PubMed ID: 11662571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Civil commitment of minors to mental institutions in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
    Hopcroft T
    N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1995; 21(2):543-74. PubMed ID: 11660369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Institutionalization of juveniles: what process is due? Parham v. J.R.
    Herbsleb J
    Neb Law Rev; 1980; 59(1):190-213. PubMed ID: 11658460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The rights of the mentally ill under state constitutions.
    Meisel A
    Law Contemp Probl; 1982; 45(3):7-40. PubMed ID: 11645495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constitutional law--due process does not require an adversary hearing prior to commitment of children to mental hospitals by their parent or guardian.
    Humphrey P
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 1980; 20(1):269-75. PubMed ID: 11665162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Children and the idea of liberty: a comment on the civil commitment cases.
    Garvey JH
    KY Law J; 1979-1980; 68(54):809-43. PubMed ID: 11649181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Refusal of treatment: competent child and parents -- Houston, Applicant.
    Grubb A
    Med Law Rev; 1997; 5(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 11655269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.